// you’re viewing...

Federal Government

LESSONS: Craig Thomson gives strong account of himself but those advising silence in the past were dead wrong

Craigthomson450We’ve seen it so many times before.

The witch-hunt.

VEXNEWS has started a few.

It’s the one thing that pains us greatly about the pure pleasure of producing VEXNEWS.

A target is selected. Claims are made. A frenzy ensues. The normal rules that govern our behaviour about each other get quickly suspended in the excitement.

Well, that’s what’s happened in the Craig Thomson affair.

Indeed, in this case, we’ve had the person making the claims – Kathy Jackson – given a virtual immunity from public criticism or any real accountability about her involvement in what now appears to be a widespread fraud on the members of the HSU, perpetrated by herself and her associates.

We’re contrarians here, so we don’t like the double standard and don’t like to cheer lynch-mobs along.

Thomson’s account of events was calm, strong and – even to our cynical mind – highly persuasive.

But the Parliament was never going to be the place where his guilt or innocence.

Thomson made a damning critique of Fair Work Australia that warrants urgent review.

Thomson reminded the Parliament of the serious claims of wrongdoing against Kathy Jackson and her cadre of con-artists that remain – to this day – inadequately investigated by Fair Work Australia.

He disclosed that Kathy Jackson’s partner – former Opus Dei member Michael Lawler – is “on leave” from being Vice-President of Fair Work Australia. VEXNEWS has previously reported on his extensive involvement with Jackson’s internal union and political activities. He ought to stand aside, but apparently has no plans to do so. Jackson and Lawler have apparently loudly told people within the HSU that it’s “illegal” to criticise a Fair Work Australia member. That isn’t the case, their empty threats won’t spare them the justice they deserve. It is Michael Lawler who has – in our opinion – acted in manner we believe to be beneath contempt.

Thomson reminded the media to observe some courtesies, singling out an unnamed Seven Network reporter who apparently hovered around the bathroom, while his pregnant wife was taking a shower. That was the only point in his remarks where the MP lost his calm composure.

Thomson gave the speech of his political life today. And in that speech – in its quality – we see great tragedy.

He’s a talent. He bravely gave this speech, without reading it. He drew from notes occasionally but basically just spoke from the heart, from his own knowledge. Few of his parliamentary colleagues could do this, we suspect, especially not on such difficult, intricate issues where his lawyers would have urged caution over ever utterance.

The tragedy is that for a long, long, long time, Thomson was clearly told to keep schtum. To stonewall. To be stoic. What a wholehearted political disaster that has been.

Leave no shot unanswered. That’s what we believe.

And hasn’t it been astonishingly endorsed by this whole saga. Dignified silence has cost this talented, ambitious high-flying political talent a great deal.

All political folk reading this should be haunted by this saga. And learn from it. If someone accuses you of doing the wrong thing, and you haven’t done it, you owe it to yourself, and loved ones, to ignore the cautious besuited advisers who urge silence in the face of grave claims.


Comments are disallowed for this post.

  1. Never heard Craig Thomson speak before today but I thought he was pretty impressive.

    Posted by Swing Voter | May 21, 2012, 14:19
  2. Making accusations look to be enough. Accuse, throw the mud and stand back and watch the sh!t fly.

    Evidence? Dont need that. Just put the word “alleged” before every accusation and let the media pit bulls do the rest.

    Posted by Accusations are Enough | May 21, 2012, 14:21
  3. After today’s speech I believe Thomson.

    His words and manner made a powerful indictment of the Libs. It was almost cinematic.

    Posted by Mug Punter | May 21, 2012, 14:36
  4. Why are Fairfax and the ABC saying anything of Michael Lawler? Michelle Grattan and the 7.30 Report have studiously avoided any comment on something that, to use Tony Abbott’s words, there is a stinking, putrid mess around the allegations of a senior commonwealth officer appointed by Tony Abbott.

    Posted by Victoria - the Rusting State | May 21, 2012, 14:40
  5. Your famous Bolano!! for all the wrong reasons!!

    Posted by Buffoon | May 21, 2012, 14:51
  6. what a revolting cunt. I hope the mob do make him pay for his sins

    Posted by chris | May 21, 2012, 14:52
  7. You people are serious?

    Almost everything he said was a complete mis-representation of the truth.

    His performance, like the man himself, was a disgrace.

    Posted by Unbelievable. | May 21, 2012, 14:53
  8. Deary me. The bloke is as guilty as sin. His not alone in the Union industry, but let’s not feel sorry for him here

    Posted by "high-flying political talent" LOL | May 21, 2012, 14:54
  9. What a disgusting bunch of low life scumbags these unionists are. We had to put up with all the Fegan/Jackson dirty laundry being aired on Vex for years so we all know what kind of filth we are dealing with here. Bring back the Guillotine!

    Posted by scum of the earth | May 21, 2012, 14:55
  10. Having watched Thomson give his explanation to the Parliament I am of the firm view that he has the right of innocence and that his exoplaintaio0n has merit. Most notable was the flaws in the process of the Fair Work Commission and the role played by Michael Williamson.

    The media have placed themselves in the position of being prosecutor, jury and judge. The scurrilous attack by the opposition has seriously undermined public confidence in due process and the rule of law. Their action is a clear abuse of parliament, if allowed to continue would bring the parliament into further disrepute and set a very dangerous precedent.

    We have already seen the double standards lack of principle and recklessness in the oppositions opportunistic gutter tactics.

    Posted by Mocking Bird | May 21, 2012, 15:18
  11. Unbelievable by name, unbelievable by nature.

    While unions get a bad rap, private enterprise is let off the hook. The most cynical exercise is Joyce’s announcement of 500 heavy engineering job cuts at Melbourne Airport at the same time Thomson was making his speech. Trio Superannuation collapses leaving over 5000 victims of fraud. The High Court finds that Hardie Directors failed in their duties in approving a misleading ASX announcement about the state of funding for asbestos victims.

    Anyway, I am much impressed by the real investigative journalism undertaken Vexnews. I now realise that the mainstream press, especially Fairfax (Michelle Grattan et al) and the ABC (7.30 report) have been very selective in their reporting on this issue.

    Posted by Michelle | May 21, 2012, 15:19
  12. Some journalists should hang their heads in shame. Commentators and so called fairfax schmoozers who edit the truth to suit a story . Mclymont from SMH is described as one of these so called “journalists”

    Sydney Morning Herald – Sept 12, 2009

    The Age – Sept 12, 2009

    This journalist deliberately perpetrates stories which are errors of fact, but has her own brand of sarcasm and seeks to be malicious.

    Even with the opportunities to verify facts, she fails to do so and plagiarises the tabloid media, thus continuing the errors. To do so when she know they are incorrect, smacks of gross dishonesty. You are unlikely to be contacted as she can better fabricate a story if she is not deliberately informed that it is false.
    This journalist refuse Thomson a right of reply and gave Jackson carte blanche , where is the code of ethics for journalists, they are as responsible for peddling assertions and accusations disguising them as fact fuelled by a desperate opposition of the likes of slimy Pyne and Abbott .

    Posted by Scoop that | May 21, 2012, 15:20
  13. i watched and listened to Thomson in the Parliament today- he seems to be more genuine than Abbott or ‘are you a poofter?’ Heffernan

    Posted by the Insider | May 21, 2012, 15:24
  14. I agree Thomson gave a very convincing speech, and I believe what he said. He came across as an intelligent, thoughtful person who would do the right thing. However, I was disappointed that there were hardly any Labor members present to support him while he spoke. Are they using the excuse that Thomson is now an independent so what he says has nothing to do with them? I thought this looked gutless.

    Posted by Lozza | May 21, 2012, 15:30
  15. Jackson to do a press conference with Bolano , responding to Thomson’s statement.

    Will she address the myriad conflicts of interests? and why her partner second in charge of FWA did not stand aside whilst the FWA investigated her Union ? Whether or not she will pay back all those board honorariums back to her membership if she is fair dinkum about transparency and accounatbility?

    Posted by Scoop that | May 21, 2012, 15:36
  16. Oh no, is Heffernan to be joined by Craig Kelly?

    Posted by Michelle | May 21, 2012, 15:41
  17. He claims the Investigation was flawed because he was only interviewed by FWA once…

    People realise he was asked repeatedly by FWA to address further questions, but he refused to, right?

    Posted by Unbelievable. | May 21, 2012, 15:53
  18. He gave a good account of himself and was believable.

    Jackson is a joke.

    It’s a stitch up.

    Posted by Slugger | May 21, 2012, 16:02
  19. You are joking Thomson is an actor he didn’t address the issues of hookers, donation to his campaign or any of his other dodgy things he has done just blame others

    Posted by Bs & more Bs | May 21, 2012, 16:11
  20. So the FWA report counts for nothing? Is this the most laughable blog on the internet? I’m not sure whether I can hear tin cans rattling or the wind whistling in the empty spaces.

    Posted by Echo..echo....echo.......echo | May 21, 2012, 16:13
  21. Michelle Grattan effectively calls Craig Thomson a liar.

    Posted by Michelle | May 21, 2012, 16:22
  22. You call that a strong account?

    Here are just a few of the key issues that he completely failed to address:

    Why he approved payment of what he claims were fake claims for prostitutes on two of his union credit cards.

    Why he did not go to police when the fraud surfaced.

    Why he has refused to talk to NSW police since.

    Why he needed so many cash withdrawals, and what the money was spent on.

    Why he claimed to have returned unspent cash withdrawals often, when the union official responsible for receiving such returns says she cannot remember him doing so once.

    Why he claimed Fairfax had been told by its handwriting analyists that the signatures on the brothel payments were not his, when Fairfax denies having had any such advice.

    Why he had no union approval for hiring two people with union money to work on his election.

    The Left are kidding themselves if they truly believe Thompson has cleared himself!

    Posted by R U Serious | May 21, 2012, 16:24
  23. Why do Michelle Grattan and the 7.30 Report remain silent on Michael Lawler?????

    Bs & more Bs … you need a seeing eye/hearing dog.

    Posted by Michelle | May 21, 2012, 16:26
  24. Great work vex news!!!!!

    Posted by Michelle | May 21, 2012, 16:28
  25. so the facts are we have one labor MP accused of misusing union funds hung in public by the coalition- yet accross the board there are coalition MPs and party members dodging speeding fines (qld), alegedly commiting hate crimes (NSW), in court on charges of fraud (SA) and misuising their parliamentary cars and allowances (vic)- not to mention “just a friendly drink” pyne stalking the young staffers.. I know which party i’d rather be a member of.

    Posted by Sotherby | May 21, 2012, 16:35
  26. Thomson is calling for video footage from brothels like years later they are realy going to have kept it dream on Thomson is innocent is as believable as my dog talking

    Posted by Bs & more Bs | May 21, 2012, 16:44
  27. Andy,I think it was very cruel of you to leave the sarc.tag off the bottom of your piece.You know there are poor deluded souls who will now think that you were serious.

    Posted by Bruce. | May 21, 2012, 16:44
  28. “I reject all his claims as false, pathetic and delusional that he makes against me and others.”

    Thus spoke Kathy Jackson. And so the matter will end there – if journalists stay true to form.

    Or, they could actually investigate Thomson’s allegations. Here’s an idea. Why not get a view of her from a cross-section of the Victorian HSU members allegedly ripped off by her? Why not ask her some specific questions about specific allegations such as ‘Did you destroy documents?’ Why not ask her if the real prize in all this has all along been the HSU and the influence peddling she could control as its head?

    Or, dear journalists, if you can’t do any of that, at least stop strewing her malodorous and grubby path to power with roses.

    Posted by Journalists do your job | May 21, 2012, 16:55
  29. Gina Rinahart must be over the moon on the return on her investment in Fairfax media.

    Bs and more Bs – it’s called evidence. You sound like the sort of guy who would go to a brothel, not only use your credit card but also show your driver’s licence, and to make sure that no one could not find out about your visi, you ring up the brothel on both your mobile phone and hotel room phone beforehand.

    Thomson doesn’t sound that stupid, but I’m a bit worried about you. Take your seeing eye dog/hearing dog along next time. They say that dogs have the intelligence of an 8 year old.

    Posted by Michelle | May 21, 2012, 17:17
  30. Thompson calling for video footage of the brothel concerned was a game changer for me. A guilty person would not do that! If he is innocent, and I tend to think so, he has had a great injustice done against him and his family. Phoney Tony should hang his head in shame.

    Posted by Murray Grey | May 21, 2012, 17:26
  31. How a trial by media works in Australia.

    1. Identify your target.

    2. Have accusations made and then have them referred to a government body for “investigation”.

    3. Report the accusations as fact.

    4. Hound your prey, make them “prove they are innocent”.

    5. At the end of the “investigation” if nothing is found, keep the story going reporting words like “dodged a bullet” or “not officially charged” or “will be the subject to ongoing investigation”

    Posted by How It Works | May 21, 2012, 17:28
  32. very good craig!!! you are kidding yourself. you are no better than DEAN MIGHELL a pathological liar and thief both a disgrace to the union movement.time both of you are charged and expelled.

    Posted by jimmy | May 21, 2012, 17:30
  33. Todays journalists don’t seek the truth they seek sales.

    Grattan & Mclimont & 2 examples where truth was obfuscated for a headline and towing the populist line. Getting facts involves going against the grain of the “pack” .

    Pyne & the LNP are great media finessers , i mean why would you scratch the surface and worry about fairness and process when it’s a minority Govt? Had it not been i guarantee this “theatre” would not have ocurred.

    Thomson eloquently pointed out the “lynch mob” mentality , and the separation of parliamentary and judicial processess , even quoting to kill a mockingbird to illustate the parity of everyone in the law’s eyes , and how judicial process should determine a persons “guilt” not parliament.

    The fact that a very Senior Legal officer of the FWA who has strong ties to the accuser and the LNP did not step down through the FWA investigation is of great concern.

    Which brings us to why a very senior Judicial officer in the FWA did not step aside given the close ties to the accuser of the whole affair, but choses to step down now?

    Posted by Anon | May 21, 2012, 17:40
  34. Murray – the ‘game changer’ is more smoke and mirrors.

    He allegedly had the prostitutes come to his hotel.

    So the CCTV from the brothels (which probably never existed to start with, especially this late after the fact) is completely irrelevant.

    It’s just another attempt from Thomson to muddy the water.

    Posted by Unbelievable. | May 21, 2012, 17:59
  35. Kathy Jackson just wants to be a high flying socialite, with her pics in all the papers wearing the latest hat and couture creations, while her members sweat over getting $15.00 an hour and trying to raise a family on those low wages.

    Posted by sara west | May 21, 2012, 18:14
  36. Got to remember the media rule of thumb “if it bleeds it leads”.

    The bigger the tragedy, the bigger the story and the more sales.

    One sided attacks over something as juicy to public morals as prostitutes makes great headlines.

    Balancing the story in the view of the media hacks undermines their own argument and looks like they are trying to have a bob each way.

    Splash out a grabbing headline, ramp up the salacious claims and run the accusations as though they are God’s own words.

    That’s how the modern media work and Abbott & Libs know just how to feed that beast.

    Posted by Sales! | May 21, 2012, 18:17
  37. Jackson made and has maintained her accusations in public out in the open, in the public arena where she is wide open to be sued, taken to court etc.
    Thomson cowls behind the privilege of Parliament where he can say anything about anyone without fear of litigation.


    Posted by Sue | May 21, 2012, 18:22
  38. Soooo Craig Kelly MP has now failed to declare he is/was a Director of a company in liquidation?

    How’s he not being hounded the way Thomson has been?!?!

    Ohhh that’s right, Kelly’s alleged misdeeds arent as gripping as using prostitutes.

    Its not about right or wrong, its about how it can be beat up by media hacks.

    Posted by Craig Kelly | May 21, 2012, 18:26
  39. big difference, easy to slag everyone in public when you have union-busting Stuart wood doing your pro bono legals

    Posted by Anon | May 21, 2012, 19:02
  40. I kid you not, Jackson is demanding a right of reply in parliament

    Posted by Nutter | May 21, 2012, 19:19
  41. Michelle Gratton is right he is a liar and he paid for escorts not brothel workers, so why would there be video tapes. Nobody set him up but he is holding Julia up.
    The only real winners are the mill stone around Gillards neck “The Greens”

    Posted by Mother | May 21, 2012, 19:27
  42. There are a lot of delusional unionists on this site.

    Yes – on the available evidence it is credible to claim there were other corrupt officials in the HSU.

    No – this does not mean CT is innocent. To believe that you would have to believe in the greatest conspiracy theory in Australian history. Which clearly a number of you muppets do.

    Posted by Ronnie | May 21, 2012, 19:55
  43. So, claims against Thomson are seen as “fact” but Thomson’s claims are seen as “claims”.

    Yeah, gotta love the double standards.

    Posted by Accusations are Enough | May 21, 2012, 19:58
  44. A liar being supported by another (Ju)liar

    Posted by A Jansen | May 21, 2012, 19:58
  45. So Kathy Jackson makes all sorts of allegations against Thomson, he returns fire and she is outraged by it.

    Kathy Jackson can dish it out but not take it back it seems LOL.

    Posted by LOL | May 21, 2012, 20:18
  46. I heard only some of his Parliamentary speech today.

    Did Thompson say he did not use the HSU credit card for whore mongering? No.

    Did Thompson explain why he used HSU funds for his private (ALP) campaign in the Division of Dobell? No.

    Did he say that he got permission of the HSU to use their members money for his personal (ALP) campaign? No.

    Donations from trade unions, public and private companies and lobby groups to political campaign should be banned. Donations should individual donations only and then limited to $10,000 per election.

    Posted by Adrian Jackson | May 21, 2012, 20:20
  47. Speech was long on emotion and accusation but almost totally bereft of any evidence or details.

    If indeed he was set up and victimised it almost makes things worse as the culture and endemic misappropriation of HSU members funds has then been ratified by a party so desperate to stay in power that it turned a blind eye to the very principles that it was founded to protect.

    Posted by 2ndeffort | May 21, 2012, 20:31
  48. Thomson is about as straight as a snake’s breakfast. He makes Jim Cairns denying his affair with Juni Morosi look like playground stuff. He failed to rebut any of main allegations. Who wrote his very clever speech?

    Posted by kk | May 21, 2012, 20:38
  49. When did the law change to force the accused to prove their innocence? Surely the accusers have to prove guilt. And anyone that pays for legal advice then ignores it is a fool.

    Posted by DeepNorthernSong | May 21, 2012, 20:43
  50. If Lawler as claimed by ex employee of HSU was bullied into not resigning so that Kathy can retain support as reported,would you not call that interference in a matter of which he has no business ??What ever happend to the complaint lodged by that employee to the president of the FWA?? What guarantees then that he did not meddle with the report ??

    Posted by reality check | May 21, 2012, 20:48
  51. Wow.
    Craig is a crook AND a sook!

    Posted by Marina de Cleaner | May 21, 2012, 20:55
  52. Didn’t jackson just drop Lawler into it on 7.30 report????!!!!!!OMG she’s on $270k , getting pro bono from Liberal lawyers and she’s doing it all for the working poor!!! so selfless

    Posted by anonymous | May 21, 2012, 20:57
  53. Another terrible performance by Jackson on ABC. Can you stop taking interviews Kathy. You are such a liar. There is no justice. How can she get away each time? Why does the media just believe her words without taking a close scrunity. You are just as stinky as Thomson!

    Posted by Anon | May 21, 2012, 21:02
  54. Financial Review reports

    “Jackson discussed Thomson with Lawler”
    She said it was “appropriate” for her to discuss the dramas associated with the HSU.

    “I ask him for advice and assistance, but he is not running the case of the HSU,” she said.

    “I tell him what I am doing and not the other way around.”

    Posted by anonymous | May 21, 2012, 21:27
  55. That was a cracker of a performance tonight Kathy, you dumped Lawler in it big time, give it away crazy Katrina

    Posted by Mad Kaff | May 21, 2012, 21:30
  56. Kathy, you just dropped your partner deep in it. Marco, you are a bloody liar, anyone who knows you and who has worked at the HSU knows that you are a thug. How many times were complaints made about you by your workplace colleagues about your intimidation and bullying to Jeff Jackson. Now we all know why he did nothing about it. Marco, does everyone know that you intimidated a female from Worksafe and got in her face and she slapped it, so you had her charged and she was sacked. You are such a weak heap of shit – Marco before you face cameras ago, please learn how to speak properly. Kathy, you could not employ him for his skills, must be something else

    Posted by Anon | May 21, 2012, 21:31
  57. I think I could give Craig a job in the new Hills Shire Council.
    His behavior is most impressive. He has met all the targets I expect for a puppet that will work for me. I’ll give him a position send him to me – no Resume needed.

    Posted by Alex Hork | May 21, 2012, 21:51
  58. So Kathy get’s free advice from Judge lawler as well ??? and thinks it’s okay?

    Any normal & sane person would think this is totally inappropriate .

    Posted by pro bono no-no | May 21, 2012, 21:57
  59. Give Craig Thompson a fair go folks. After getting more insight to some of the characters in the union, it is very possible he could be innocent!! This is a classic case of innocent until proven guilty..

    Posted by The Bruce | May 21, 2012, 21:58
  60. The award for audacity and spinning for 2012 goes to Thommo.

    What a load of crap Thommo delivered today.

    Completely unbelievable.

    Posted by Anon | May 21, 2012, 22:40
  61. interesting BOTH Mr. Nassios and Mr. Lawler are on leave from FWA. at the same time!

    Posted by joe | May 21, 2012, 22:48
  62. I have tried to stay objective in listening and reading all this negativity surrounding the union who’ve I’ve belonged too for several years. The one thing I found interesting is after listening to Chrisopher Pyne, the Lib attack dog, and both the reply’s from Kathy Jackson and Marco Bolano is the three of them were so obviously reading of the same hymn sheet. It is so very obvious that Jackson and Bolano are working so closely with the Libs to destroy not only Thompson and Williamson and not only the HSU union but the entire union movement. To all those Jackson / Bolano fans, play back the media conference by Pyne and the reply’s by Jackson and Bolano and then say to yourself that a so called union official, who is meant to e so proud to fight for the battlers is working so closely with the Libs. Then see if you call Jackson a hero ????

    Posted by Disgusted Vic HSUeast Member | May 21, 2012, 23:07
  63. Thomson gave a very broad brush treatment to the allegations and findings against him, it was not a particularly convincing performance and there is a number of things that bother me greatly that have not been answered. One is why? I work in a union that has had its fair share of dickhead national secretaries rorting workers while they wait for preselection or some other cushy job. Basically most of the ‘worker bees’ in the union are just waiting for them to go, they are glad to see the back of them so why would anyone do anything to ruin the career or keep it up after the person has gone? It makes no sense to me. Some of Thomsons claims are very disingenuous such as demanding the footage from brothels, they were escorts, it would be better to call for the CCTV from the hotels he frequented if they keep CCTV footage and I doubt they do. He did not explain anything in regards to the whopping cash withdrawals nor did he even attempt to deal with the Communigrafix allegations. I was not at all convinced by todays performance. Whilst I can almost believe anything when it concerns the Right of the ALP, this was just a little too bizarre and Thomson while saying plenty actually when it is boiled off he said very little. I am also sick of the media treatment of it all and the lack on any investigative skill. Why aren’t they asking and investigation why the union is so dysfunctional? The media mentions ‘factional warfare’ but who drives those factions and who stands to gain from whichever factions rules? Who is really controlling the HSU and who stands to gain from the government level? Whose numbers are they; which ALP politician gains from them? Thomson resolved nothing today he just had his chance to bite back at people whom by all accounts are allegedly as bad as he is.

    Posted by Anonymous | May 21, 2012, 23:07
  64. So the big revelation on the 7.30 Report is that Kathy spoke to Michael about Craig.

    No shit. That’s been on the public record – in fact she told The Australian she was reluctant to make the allegations until she and he got on the piss one night.


    Posted by Anon | May 21, 2012, 23:10
  65. OMG, I knew Marco Bolano was dumb, but that door stop he did outside the Vic HSU office actually proved once and for all how fucking stupid this moron really is.. I couldn’t stop laughing at how he couldn’t even use correct English expressions properly. And this turd is an official of a union earning $270k per year plus tips.. OMG, this union is dead and buried.

    Posted by OMG | May 21, 2012, 23:11
  66. This is a union folks, I wouldn’t give any of them the time of day, and most sensible people wouldn’t give them a job hence they work for a union. So we are starting of a low base. However Mr. Thomson’s rambling but clearly prepared (he had notes) speech today was more interesting for what he didn’t say.

    He didn’t say:

    1. I have never used union funds or a union credit card on prostitutes.
    2. I have never withdrawn union cash from an ATM and used it for my own purposes.
    3. All the questioned expenditures including those on my election campaign were properly approved by the union.

    If innocent this could have been the first 90 seconds of his speech yet nearly an hour later, still no denial. Every day he sits in parliament the lower the ALP slides into turpitude.

    No, like our dissembling PM he used lawyered up words that don’t mean anything. Even if innocent an honourable Mr Thomson would have resigned by now to clear his name. He did not. He is not honourable.

    Posted by Harry Won A Bagel | May 21, 2012, 23:46
  67. Marco Balano and Kathy Jackson are true patriots.

    Posted by Anon | May 21, 2012, 23:58
  68. Is the general thrust of this article that Thompson should have started lying to the public sooner?

    Posted by Anonski | May 22, 2012, 0:11
  69. If I was asked to choose between Jackson and Thomson as to who to believe I would choose Thomson. Many people will tell you that Andrew is full of BS in the end you have to agree with them as in time they are proven right. Jackson has lied on more then one occasion, Her credibility is as low as VEXNEWS if not lower.

    Posted by True believer fooled again | May 22, 2012, 0:32
  70. Thomson said he was there when the HSU disputes were between left and left, then left vs right, then right vs right. What Thomson was telling us about was the gradual takeover of HSU by the right, which I take to mean those favouring Workchoices.

    Posted by silkworm | May 22, 2012, 0:37
  71. Tony Windsor asks if some lines in the sand should be drawn giving rise to an automatic disqualification from sitting in Parliament. For Windsor’s sake, let’s hope that guilty findings on drink driving charges don’t place him on the wrong side of the line.

    Posted by Anonski | May 22, 2012, 0:42
  72. One could infer from Kathy Jackson’s comments that the stress and pressure on Craig Thomson has affected him to such an extent that his mental health is an issue and he may be delusional. I will avoid any pot/kettle allusions as they are entirely inappropriate.

    Posted by DeepNorthernSong | May 22, 2012, 0:46
  73. ***the only point in his remarks where the MP lost his calm composure***

    You do realise that moment was scripted, don’t you?

    Posted by Byron in Wahroonga | May 22, 2012, 0:46
  74. ***dignified silence has cost this talented, ambitious high-flying political talent a great deal***


    Free hookers, for starters.

    Posted by Byron in Wahroonga | May 22, 2012, 0:48
  75. Balano, Jackson, Williamson and Thomson should all be sacked.

    Posted by Anon | May 22, 2012, 0:50
  76. d roots h
    d leaves wife for h
    h says no way you root around
    h goes to usa to work for obama
    jj thinks she needs to be supported – fair enough its good training sends $5k of HSU dolars to USA
    H comes home
    D and kj get all pissy at xmas do – KJ tells george just open up your heart to H and she will come over to you
    G says – wont work she has been rooting your husband for six months
    KJ decides to burn house down with herself in it

    Posted by seriously | May 22, 2012, 0:53
  77. Thomson should certainly be sacked. He is absolute filth.

    Posted by Anonski | May 22, 2012, 1:05
  78. So if Thomson is so guilty, why no charges? Why nothing before the Courts?

    Because whispers, rumour and accusations dont amount to sh!t in a court.

    In the court of public opinion they are of course more than enough to try, convict and punish.

    Posted by LOL | May 22, 2012, 2:00
  79. ***if Thomson is so guilty, why no charges?***

    There will charges! Right after the investigation into the Alpine Offset fire is finished.

    Posted by Byron in Wahroonga | May 22, 2012, 2:22
  80. ***Thomson should certainly be sacked. He is absolute filth***

    Since when is that grounds for an MP’s dismissal?

    Posted by Byron in Wahroonga | May 22, 2012, 2:27
  81. A young Tony Abbot was found guilty of an offence, but the judge, quite rightly, considered all factors and chose not to have the conviction recorded. All good, legal process, etc. Tony Abott should be judged for what he does as an adult, elected representative with his bare-faced, stunningly hypocrictical, opportunistic, I should be PM, dummy-spitting.

    Posted by DeepNorthernSong | May 22, 2012, 2:32
  82. Craig does have a promising career post politics – daytime soap opera!

    Posted by Anon | May 22, 2012, 3:43
  83. And you anon point is ? That any politician you do not like, should be…?

    Posted by DeepNorthernSong | May 22, 2012, 4:20
  84. Last one was silly coughing thing, can you please delete?

    Posted by DeepNorthernSong | May 22, 2012, 4:21
  85. As was said, his biggest mistake was staying silent for so long and allowing the Liberals and the media to fill in the blanks. They made the same mistake with the carbon tax.

    Thomson being innocent simply doesn’t fit the accepted narrative and even if there was 100% conclusive evidence of his innocence, the media would still call him guilty and their gullible sheep-like readers would accept it.

    It’s Lindy Chamberlain all over again.

    Posted by Benny | May 22, 2012, 6:36
  86. Why haven’t Thomson’s accusations been tested? If he is so delusional surely they can stand up in a court of law ? So far not 1 charge?

    Jackson admits to driving a luxury volvo, childcare fees paid and gym fees & international trips, legal fees at members expense is kosher if it has all been endorsed . Is this why it’s so important for her to control the union and essentially this what this ongoing battle is about, factional & financial control ?Endgame control of the whole entity called HSU East, Is that why her partner Lawler took the extraordinary step to call an employee and pressure her to stay on in order for Jackson to retain that full control?

    Posted by Anon | May 22, 2012, 7:42
  87. Oh my… the mass delusion is breathtaking.
    Just because there are other dirty HSU types around, and those connected with them, doesn’t make Craig Thompson suddenly credible.
    Anyone who was convinced of his innocence by his “speech” needs to look up the term “cognitive dissonance”. Whilst not a perfect fit for your condition,it’s close enough.

    What about;
    – The under the table credit card(s) provided by the HSU printer?
    – The several hundred thousand dollars spent on his election campaign?
    – The clearly corrupt goings on in the (most dysfunctional union in Australia) HSU, take Michael Williamson and his associates for starters.
    – Why he settled with Fairfax (his delay in doing so, opening up all this evidence in discovery because of his stupidity – Richo warned him this would happen, too!)
    – Where are the actual explanations for anything? His speech was simply mud slinging, accusations, obfuscation without a single issue actually being addressed.

    Seems to have impressed some simpletons here, though… confirmation bias anyone?

    Posted by LeftRightOut | May 22, 2012, 8:06
  88. The only thing I will say is I hope after all the dust is settled and all the claims and counter claims have been made, all the court actions have been held and judgements handed down, I only hope all those ‘ true believers’ of Kathy Jackson will stand down from their roles, from their jobs, from their opinions when this two faced, egotistical, hypocritical , vindictive, so called freedom fighter who actually has ripped of decent union members along with her ex husband Jeff Jackson for years and years, for nothing but personal gain will eventually be proven as the true crook and fraud that she is. This She Devil deserves all that is coming her way and that of that ape that is consistently on her arm the dumbest man on the planet none other than Marco Bolano

    Posted by The truth will come out | May 22, 2012, 8:19
  89. LRO, the electoral commission have cleared Thomson of any wrongdoing,as for visiting brothels, one of the three charges related to his visits occurred when he was on the other side of the continent. He did not ‘settle’with Fairfax.

    Posted by sara west | May 22, 2012, 9:10
  90. Interesting though that he spoke of the CCTV footage. Various posters in here thinks its safe to call for it, because it would no longer exist.

    Wrong. It does exist. it was part of the ‘discovery’ in the defamation case. Fairfax have it, but cant use it.

    One wonders what it shows…….

    Posted by Armed against the Enemy | May 22, 2012, 9:10
  91. LeftRightOut, it’s a very simple matter:

    – All we still have is a series of allegations. Thomson is not charged with anything (as Brandis was keen to point out this morning, in order to justify the continuing parliamentary and media witch hunt against his target).

    – Craig Thomson’s accuser (Kathy Jackson) is in far deeper and more serious water than he is.

    – Kathy Jackson’s husband, Michael Lawler, is the #2 at the organisation which has produced this so-called adverse report.

    – Lawler is a judge of a Federal tribunal responsible for regulating unions. There are now allegations that he personally intervened into a factional dispute that Jackson was engaged in, threatening HSU industrial officers, then reporting them to police with alleged details of internal HSU emails attached. This right here is a deeply serious national scandal going right to the heart of the FWA’s impartiality and capability.

    – the FWA report in any case, is not a brief of evidence, it’s not at all compiled with the rules of evidence in mind (so its not admissible in a court). The AEC report shreds key parts of the FWA’s report.

    – But against all this, the media have decided that Thomson “seems guilty” (I mean … PROSTITUTES!) and that’s enough for the hangman to be called.

    – In regards to the media, ABC and Fairfax in particular, but of course News Ltd always love a good Union/ALP kicking, so what media outlets do we have left? It’s left to bloggers and online news outlets to actually uncover new information (i.e. Lawler’s activities which are certainly extremely serious allegations, far worse than anything levelled at Thomson, and this morning completely ignored by the ABC and Fairfax).

    Posted by Baygon | May 22, 2012, 9:12
  92. From this blog the jury on Thompson is split 50/50. It is difficult to beleive that so many people can be hoodwinked. This bloke is an actor doing a very good job. His prolonged silence was because a good script cannot be written over night. Windsor and Oakshott are trying to portray themselves as the pillars of virtue whike they are acting in self interest. Andy half your readers are dopes.

    Posted by meddler | May 22, 2012, 9:15
  93. Kathy’s henchmen (note plural) have made threats to more than one official. It is how they respond.
    It also seems FWA computers had internal HSUeast emails on them (Independent Australia report). During a recent HSUeast meeting Jackson used her mobile phone and it was obvious to all who she called when Lalwer’s mailbox message came on.

    Posted by Blind Freddy | May 22, 2012, 9:37
  94. We seem to care more about who’s f###### who for cash, yet we fail to notice the planet being F##### for cash in front of us. Its all f#####.

    Posted by F.B. Jinn | May 22, 2012, 9:44
  95. ***It’s Lindy Chamberlain all over again***


    If Lindy hired prostitutes using her employer-supplied Centurion credit card.

    Posted by Byron in Wahroonga | May 22, 2012, 9:55
  96. I am not sure of Mr Thomson’s innocence, but I sure know that numerous others need to be investigated. Let the whole episode, with all the players, eg Kathy Jackson and company be dealt with in a court of law.

    Posted by Helen | May 22, 2012, 10:18
  97. He had a chance to give his side of the allegations against him . But no he wanted to tell a story hoping some fools would believe him. He did not get to the core of any of the main allegations and answer with “an attack against his rights”
    Mother says send him to the naughty corner for being a little lying shit What has happened to the Labor Party of old to let their good name pulled down into the mud

    Posted by Mother | May 22, 2012, 10:19
  98. Thomson is entitled to the presumption of innocence – end of story. THE OPPOSITION LEADER JUST DOESN’T GET IT. The opposition leader is not worthy of a seat in parliament if he does not uphold this fundamental principle. He should NOT get the right to grill Thomson, he should not get the right to question or reply to Thomson’s statement that he is screeching about today. Parliament is NOT a court and if anybody is bringing the parliament down to gutter level it is him and his attack dog Pyne. I repeat HE IS NOT WORTHY OF THE OFFICE OF PM. His relentless attacks, his going ON and ON and ON about how the public are supposedly sick of this government can be equally turned around on him. I AM SICK OF HEARING HIM CHANGE THE RECORD. Get over it. Wait your turn, do a proper job of opposing – come up with interesting and novel alternate policies. EARN THE JOB!

    Posted by LS | May 22, 2012, 10:41
  99. Those believing thompson says alot about their mental processes, or lack of. Thompson did not answer questions about the abuse of union members funds to fund “his” election campaign and other questions. As for the tapes at brothels, people, the girls were paid for for “escort services”. He would not have visited the house but had a girl visit him! Ergo, he will not appear on a tape as he was not there!!!! So many questions not answered and so many changes in story from the FWA report that he provided answers to. Some believe in the tooth fairy by some of the comments here & will vote for jooles no matter what.

    Posted by cynic | May 22, 2012, 10:52
  100. ***His relentless attacks, his going ON and ON and ON about how the public are supposedly sick of this government***

    He’s doing his job. If Gillard was doing hers, she wouldn’t be in this mess.

    Posted by Byron in Wahroonga | May 22, 2012, 10:53
  101. what a liar liar pants on fire, he damaged his family, his career and his workfriends if he has any left, and he has no morals, what a gutless piece of shit he is he needs to own up and retain some respect for himself!

    Posted by chris | May 22, 2012, 11:19
  102. Dear LS, this is not about the opposition stop deflecting , this is about a married man using company funds to use prostitutes, he has no respect for women , his family , nor himself!

    Posted by chris | May 22, 2012, 11:21
  103. Another Age ‘journalist’, Kate McClymont, has called Thomson a liar. And who does she turn to for support, Graham Richardson, who accuses Thomson of living in a parallel universe. Age ‘journalists’ should be careful – if you with dogs, you will get fleas.

    Wikipedia has the following entries for Richardson:
    Tax evasion
    In 2006, Richardson became embroiled in allegations of tax evasion involving the late Rene Rivkin.[45] On 27 September 2006, Justice James Allsop, of the Federal Court, released a document showing that Richardson had an undeclared Swiss bank account containing $1.4 million.[46] He was one of the shareholders of the Offset Alpine Printing company.
    In October 2008, Richardson agreed to pay an undisclosed sum to end his ongoing A$2.3 million dispute with the Australian Taxation Office.[47] The Tax Office took action against Mr Richardson in 2005 after the late stockbroker Rene Rivkin told Swiss investigators that Rivkin, businessman Trevor Kennedy and Richardson were the secret owners of a $27 million stake in Offset Alpine. The Tax Office had sought $700,000 it claimed was owed in unpaid taxes, along with a $1.6 million interest and penalty payment.

    Baldwin had earlier initiated inquiries into ‘rorts’ in the Enmore and other branches.[14][15] Police began investigation into the assault on Baldwin, and included matters relating to the affairs of the Labor Party Enmore branch. Five people, including Joe Meissner and Tom Domican were charged with various offences. Richardson, in a later interview, confirmed that at the time he wrote to Attorney-General Frank Walker and all other Cabinet Ministers in the Wran Government to ask that the case be dropped on the grounds that it was a Labor Party and not a police matter. Even the Magistrate, was approached. In dismissing the Enmore charges, the Magistrate said:[14]
    It seems that some force or forces were working improperly to undermine the strength of the prosecution. I am firmly of the opinion that this matter calls for further investigation.

    Richardson was implicated in the Cash for comment scandal in Australian radio broadcasting, where prominent radio personalities – such as John Laws and Alan Jones– were found to have been promoting certain companies while on the companies’ payroll, while keeping the deal secret from listeners to make it look like the comments were genuine opinion/editorial pieces, or that they had demanded payments from companies in exchange for refraining from making negative comments. Richardson was being paid by Publishing and Broadcasting Limited (PBL), and spruiked for PBL-owned companies Channel 9 and Crown Casino during his radio show.

    Richardson is now primarily seen by the Australian public through election night television coverage. He is a currently a political commentator for the Seven Network(having previously appeared on the Nine Network) and broadcaster with 2GB. He has also authored memoirs titled Whatever it Takes, published by Bantam Books, Sydney, 1994. For the 2000 Sydney Olympics he was the chairman of the Olympic ticketing operations, Mayor of the Olympic village and had a seat on the Sydney Organising Committee of the Olympic Games (SOCOG).
    In 1999, as chairman of the 2000 Sydney Olympics ticketing operations, Richardson oversaw a deal where over 500,000 selected tickets were withheld from the public ticket lottery and reserved for high-paying package-deal customers. This resulted in considerable public criticism at the time and the tickets were eventually made available to the general public.[43][44]

    Posted by Michelle | May 22, 2012, 12:15
  104. Yep, Richo is a true scumbag and he can pick another scumbag at 200 paces. He knows where all of the Labor dirt is. If he nominates somebody as a fellow scumbag, then you can’t get a better reference than that.

    Posted by Jim | May 22, 2012, 12:31
  105. I’m not about to join a lynch-mob or cheer it on. If Thomson is exonerated (and this can only happen before the courts and not the Parliament) we all know that the proponents of journalistic spite won’t take a backward step. No contrition whatsover.

    It seems pretty clear that the HSU was run like a criminal organisation. Why should we dismiss the notion of a set-up? This seems to have been the default mechanism to call dissidents into line. Thomson’s allegations are well worth testing, but not through the bent perspective of the live-in lover of the complainant.

    Posted by kitepacker | May 22, 2012, 12:54
  106. Re: my supposed deflecting:

    Chris the man is innocent until proven otherwise. He has the same rights as you and I. What you are doing is saying he is guilty. And you say I am deflecting? I could just as easily say you are projecting your experiences.

    Its not up to the opposition to use this as a way of stopping due process. You have no right to pronounce him guilty, nor do they. No matter how much you might want to. It just doesn’t work that way. You are expressing an opinion and yes you can do that just as I am expressing mine. But the opposition does NOT have that right in parliament. They asked him to explain himself – he has. They do not get the right to cross examine him. It isn’t a court of law.

    I see it for what it is. The opposition being opportunistic at the expense of another persons right to innocence. I hope that what comes out of this saga is that everyone takes a long hard look at what oppotunism, and mud slinging, from both sides does for due process. The only person as far as I can tell who is behaving with any dignity at all is the Prime Minister herself. She has accepted Thomson’s wish to be placed on the indepentents bench in an effort to try to get some oxygen back into the policy debate. Stuff that actually matters to our economy. But of course the opposition want the focus on Thomson because they see that as a way of grabbing the prime ministership for Abbott. That is not democracy and I will rile against it where ever and whenever I can.

    Posted by LS | May 22, 2012, 13:29
  107. Craig Thompson has all the qualities if a modern ALP leader. He crys in public, has a wife and child (family values), is a expert financial manager, mixes with the less well off (HSU workers) and is a supporter of the under classes (whores). He could be up there with Hawke, Keating and Latham.

    Posted by Adrian Jackson | May 22, 2012, 13:29
  108. You cannot expect the protections of the presumption to innocence and at the same time seek to profit from conclusions about the merits of each presumption. Anyone with a knowledge of history can identify where the abandonment of that protection has coincided with massive oppression and apocalyptic human tragedies. The short term ambitions of venal and grasping politicians and media hungry whistle blowers shouldn’t be allowed to compromise this principle one whit.

    Posted by History | May 22, 2012, 14:02
  109. Adrian Jackson, one of the lynch mob? I imagine you are laughing and congratulating yourself coming up with tripe that adds nothing to the debate. If lynching someone without trial can be called a debate.

    Posted by LS | May 22, 2012, 14:03
  110. The government has created a kangaroo court of sorts with a FWA investigation, then stonewalled the investigation for 3 years, refused to discuss anything being investigated, put up road-blocks at every opportunity, then when the report finally comes out attacked the very kangaroo court they setup in the first place. You would think if it was an elaborate case of identity theft then Gillard would be singing it from the top of Mount Kosciuszko from the outset.

    It doesn’t pass the smell test and the voters know it. The ALP will be sent back to the stone ages at the next election.

    Posted by Fredo | May 22, 2012, 14:24
  111. Fredo – I doubt the PM would be singing it from the top of any mountain – she is a lawyer by trade. So no sorry. Thomson has stated he believes he was set up – not the PM. Please don’t get the characters confused.

    Thus far she has continually said Thomson should have his day in court. Presumption of innocence is a fundamental right. So stop inventing things.

    Posted by LS | May 22, 2012, 14:44
  112. Has anyone got some cardboard and textas?
    I need to get my wife back, it is not my fault I did an RDR and scored a young one.
    To top it off I’ve got a busy night tonight delivering hardware in my Territory.

    Posted by G Shaw | May 22, 2012, 14:58
  113. Adrian Jackson, a blast from the past! You were that crazy who carried a box cutter around Albert Park and climbing up trees to cut down yellow ribbons.

    As for Jim, who’s employing the scumbag (your words)?Channel 7!

    Posted by Michelle | May 22, 2012, 14:59
  114. Saw Marco Belano on telly last night. An example of Darwinian human de-evolution. This guy cannot string one word together let alone two…

    Posted by LOL | May 22, 2012, 14:59
  115. Michelle Grattan has being watching too many US CSI shows if she things the Fair Work Australia Report is “Forensic”. Then again, poor old Michelle doesn’t seem to have any tertiary education. Her main experience was being embedded with John Howard (children overboard, lies about Iraq Weapons of mass destruction) and his cronies.

    Posted by Michelle | May 22, 2012, 15:08
  116. Gillard has been one of the most pragmatic PMs ever, so to say she is honourably holding back from defending the one man who is the thread that holds her to power, seems a stretch.

    If playing out in a court-room, yes the government’s delaying tactics and Thompson’s statement is probably par for course in such an environment. But this is politics, and voters care about things not often found in a court-room such as the qualities of sincerity, candour and righteousness.

    Posted by Fredo | May 22, 2012, 15:39
  117. Double standars Fredo?
    NSW Liberals are accusing the party’s hierarchy of a whitewash after Senator Bill Heffernan was cleared of any wrongdoing in an alleged confrontation with a staffer.
    Liberals have told the National Times that the NSW Liberal Party director, Mark Neeham, and the NSW Liberal state president, Arthur Sinodinos, did not speak to Ray Carter, the staffer who claims he was abused by Senator Heffernan, nor any of the three people who signed statutory declarations attesting to Mr Carter’s claims.
    Sources say another two people have signed statutory declarations and these will be referred to the Liberal headquarters as early as today.

    Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/opinion/political-news/heffernan-whitewash-to-be-challenged-20120522-1z25t.html#ixzz1vZUO0imz

    Posted by Michelle | May 22, 2012, 15:57
  118. Tipping this will be the downfall of Abbott & Pyne . Two of the biggest poseurs of Aust. Politics . Jackson , Lawler, Ashby all pawns in their lust for power at all cost game, with greed being all the aboves common denominator.

    Posted by Anon | May 22, 2012, 16:03
  119. But you have to admit, Liberals do it with class:

    What Mirabella did not mention, it is now alleged, and what she had never admitted even to her family, was that Howard, 40 years her senior, was also her live-in lover for five years in the late 1990s. Nor that she had received gifts from him valued at well over $100,000 to help her election to Federal Parliament in 2001. Nor, allegedly, another substantial sum to buy her Wangaratta farmhouse in 2007.
    Advertisement: Story continues below

    Sophie Mirabella with Colin Howard at a conference in 2005.
    Nor did she say that she was the executor of his will and, his family believes, its sole beneficiary. If this is the case she stands to inherit Howard’s $1 million house in a prime street in the Melbourne suburb of Carlton.
    Neither did she say that Howard had lived for nearly a year in a cottage at the back of Mirabella and her husband’s country farmhouse as his mental and physical heath deteriorated, he grew incontinent and paranoid, and eventually had a fall which nearly killed him.

    Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/national/mirabella-in-hot-seat-over-qc-lovers-dying-days-20110922-1knct.html#ixzz1vZWycv5Q

    Posted by Michelle | May 22, 2012, 16:09
  120. Well all the above pawns appear to share the same legal team. I’m sure it’ s coincidence.

    Posted by Anon | May 22, 2012, 16:19
  121. This is all about Labor the Unions and the stinking ends they will go to for power. Pure and simple it’s about a thief that stole 500,000 dollars and got found out. Gillard needs to stop protecting Thomson because it’s that protection that has seen the publics trust in our Parlimentry Institutions and Politicians drop to an all time low.
    Finish up the bullshit, charge him, have the trial and let’s be done with it…

    Posted by Fact finder | May 22, 2012, 16:28
  122. In reply to Michelle, congratulations for articulating your comments and supporting your comments with facts, albeit references to newspaper articles. Richo is a disgruntled old former member who is now trying to validate his worth and existence by using his now media position of which he is paid a substantial amount, paid, to make inflammatory comments. I only hope Richo has not renewed his ALP membership as he may as well be a member of the Liberal Party in how he has voiced his opinion like Abbott, like Pynne, and other when the FACTS are that only three or four people actually know what went on between the HSU. Williamson, Thompson, Jackson, Bolano and possible others will hopefully very soon be required to stand up in a court of law, under oth and make their claims free from political interference. And rightly so, the preceding Judge or Judges should make an informed decision.m
    Only then will everyone know the actuall truth about no did what.
    We are just lucky we live in a democracy and have courts otherwise can you imagine what would be occurring on the streets.

    Posted by The truth will come out | May 22, 2012, 16:48
  123. Fredo, Thomson is not the thread that holds the PM in power, she is there fare and square. He is the member for Dobbell, the people of Dobbell elected him. He has not been charged with anything. If he is charged and convicted then things have changed, until then it is all speculation and inuendo, and dirt, and argy bargy.

    I worry when people start using words like “righteousness”, and qualities of sincerity as “things not often found in a court-room” because it sounds a lot like lynch mob stuff. I wonder if you ever have a problem where you need the law to work for you whether you would prefer to give this up so that others outside a court, like the media, can determine your innocence or guilt? Reasonable doubt. The presumtpion of innocence without it what have we got?

    Posted by LS | May 22, 2012, 16:49
  124. Fact finder

    Heard Mirabella has been reported to the priveleges committee.Get ready for a real sordid tale about to unfold. Will Abbott protect her ? Let’s just wait and see his double standards kick in.

    Posted by Anon | May 22, 2012, 17:10
  125. “The truth will come out”. Agreed.

    I am also glad that try as the opposition might, so far the integrity of the parliament has prevailed. They would dearly love to simply kick out Thomson, ruin him, ruin Slipper, for their own gain but actually they can’t. And they do themselves no favour constantly trying to chart their own rise to the top by stomping over democracy. If we could just get Abbott to stop with the harping on and on with his one-liners as if we are a bunch of school children without a brain of our own. Can he give us some policies. Earn the job not demand it. He never talks about any policy stuff anymore – does he think it is irrelevant or something?

    Posted by LS | May 22, 2012, 17:15
  126. Do you believe all that Thomo crap?
    If the HSU wanted him out they would have done the same as to Rudd

    Posted by cona | May 22, 2012, 18:43
  127. Don’t worry about my fingers in the till at the HSU.
    Forget about me spending members money to bribe the electors of Dobell.
    No need to ask about me shagging hookers on the HSU ticket

    Look over there … she’s drivin’ a Volvo!!!
    And Mark Riley perved on me missus in the shower!!!
    And Marco once told me what he was gonna do to me and I am so fucking stupid I let him do it!!

    Posted by Crocodile Tears Craig of Dobell | May 22, 2012, 18:50
  128. The funding for his election was above board and all declared by the AEC to be accurate and proper.

    Why do cretins invade blogs without using their brains.

    If the finding by FWA in collusion with Kathy Jackson that Thomson used all that money illegally and the AEC found it all to be legal and declared and above board why would anyone believe the FWA report?

    And the FWA findings might have been interesting, the reasonings were from the mind of a delusional fool.

    But almost no-one bothered with the reasoning because they said “”there were not rules, he broke them”.

    And he was accused of too much travel with his wife – 14 trips in 5 years while he was supposedly with hookers.

    Fair dinkum, the liberal loonies just can’t link things or even think.

    Posted by Marilyn | May 22, 2012, 19:24
  129. Michelle – Save Albert Park went very quiet after the Bracks government supported the F1-GP. This proves that it was largely an ALP front group and against Kennett rather than the F1-GP.

    Posted by Adrian Jackson | May 22, 2012, 19:27
  130. The media has decided Thomson is lying. It follows there’s no point investigating Thomson’s allegations any further. Right? 

    Wrong, in fact. Thomson accused Kathy Jackson, effectively, of having her nose in the trough. This accusation has no bearing on the substance of the allegations against Thomson himself. It can only go to Jackson’s credibility as an accuser. The accuser with dirty hands may be telling the truth about you but loses the moral authority to be pleased with herself. 

    She has subsequently been asked about her salary, her car, child care fees and overseas trips. Her answer was that they were ‘approved’. 

    The problem is that a common theme in the allegations against HSU officials is that immoderate spending was not ‘disapproved’ (for salaries for example) but that this was a product of poor rules and therefore did not make it fair, appropriate and ethical. 

    In principle the allegations against Jackson seem no different from many of those against Thomson and Williamson – taking advantage of loose controls to dig out excessive entitlements.

    In a fair world this should either cause the media to make further inquiries – or to be as hostile to her as to Thomson.

    Posted by Fair and balanced | May 22, 2012, 19:30
  131. Fact Finder, he did not steal anything.

    And the FWA report claimed that he illegally paid several workers for election work, AEC found that also to be a lie.

    The only thing outstanding is $17,000 possibly not being declared by the union.

    And Thomson was accused of the same thing in 2007 and the AEC cleared him then as well.

    The problem with being a closed minded bigot and cretin is the inabilty to think and ask one simple question – why would anyone pay hookers with credit cards?

    Hookers blackmail people, no-one would use their real name or a credit card to do the dirty.

    Really it’s like peurile children.

    Posted by Marilyn | May 22, 2012, 19:30
  132. The Herald Sun cartoon on the front page today showing Thompson with a pinocchio nose was a laugh. Pinocchio’s nose grew every time he lies.

    Also why would he get his wife pregnant when he is going to gaol soon. Poor family planning and surely he has some condoms in his suit pocket unless he is a fundamentalist Roman Catholic

    Posted by Adrian Jackson | May 22, 2012, 19:36
  133. Who cares, what most people forget is the person who started this is non other than that filthy c#nt Fegan and that should never be forgotten , when Abbott takes over the entire labour movement will pay the price

    Posted by Dog | May 22, 2012, 19:55
  134. You have to wonder why the ABC brown noses crim/inals like Graham Richar/dson. Like many Labor figures, he is up to his neck in orga/nised crime. Let’s expose the ALP’s links to the Domican’s, Medi/ch’s, Kho/ury’s and Gat/to’s of this world. The filthy crooks like Suley/man even have the nerve to use Defte/ros to defend them.
    It’s not OK for MUP to publish Gatto’s book and then have Koh/ler, the Herald Sun and the rest of the political establishment fawn all over him at the book launch.
    Ted promised to rid this state of the corrosive influence of organised crime, but has shown himself to be a joke like all other pollies.

    Posted by Anonymous | May 22, 2012, 20:19
  135. Marilyn said: “The problem with being a closed minded bigot and cretin is the inabilty to think and ask one simple question – why would anyone pay hookers with credit cards?

    Hookers blackmail people, no-one would use their real name or a credit card to do the dirty.”

    Marilyn, you are either stupid or naive — probably both. Before you lecture us from your position of ignorance about the real world open your own excuse for a mind. Go do some research before you spew your vacuous shit on here.

    Posted by Jim | May 22, 2012, 21:06
  136. It is about time everyone got real. Perhaps Thomson is guilty of a few things, but remember the fight in the stairwell between Fegan and Jackson (I do I was there). Remember the papers that went missing, first excuse was that they were destroyed in the bush fires, second was the office got flooded, third was the office was broken in to. Now, Kathy wants the right of reply in Parliament, she certainly believes she is someone, load of shit. Also the No.1 report from FWA was a joke, I believe that it too was nobbled. Cannot wait for the police report, perhaps we will all know just how many people had their fingers in the till.

    Posted by Anonoski | May 22, 2012, 22:54
  137. I blame Kathy too, I’m innocent of any corruption…sh*t they’re coming for me too!

    Posted by 'Hellfire' Sheldon | May 22, 2012, 23:25
  138. It’s alright Tony just keep the plates spinning…or should that be whips.

    Posted by Gerry Hayes | May 22, 2012, 23:26
  139. We still don’t know if it was one of the Colonel squaddies who fired the live pellet into Sophie’s big rotund tum? Or was it the elderly chap?

    Posted by anon | May 22, 2012, 23:27
  140. Marilyn, you know your first fact re the AEC is completely wrong don’t you? The FWA report concerns whether certain expenditure was properly authorised [by the National Executive of the HSU.] And the findings were that certain expenditures were not approved, and were not to the benefit of the HSU. Indeed some of the unauthorised expenditure was to Mr Thomson’s benefit personally, namely his election campaign.

    Quite specifically the FWA report says at Chapter 7 Expenditure of National Office funds on Mr Thomson’s Dobell Campaign

    204. Mr Thomson has submitted that all expenditure was disclosed in accordance with relevant electoral disclosure laws. While I make no comment or judgement (and have no knowledge) regarding whether or not this statement is correct, I note that my Investigation concerns whether there have been contraventions of the Rules or of the RAO Schedule and that any disclosures under electoral law are not relevant to my consideration of whether such contraventions have occurred.

    419. Mr Thomson has referred to conclusions of the AEC enquiry into whether Coastal Voice was an associated entity. As with Mr Thomsons earlier submission regarding electoral disclosure laws (see paragraph 204 of this chapter), I note that my Investigation concerns whether there have been contraventions of the Rules or of the RAO Schedule. Any conclusions that may have been reached by the AEC with respect to matters that may have been considered under legislation that is relevant to electoral laws are not relevant to my consideration of whether contraventions of the Rules or the RAO Schedule have occurred.

    The AEC report is completely irrelevant to the findings of the FWA report.

    Posted by Harry Won A Bagel | May 22, 2012, 23:39
  141. The Rabbott is probably the biggest political shit-thrower we have ever see.
    Me thinks this time there might be a little shit left in his burrow which might turn out to be a little uncomfortable

    Posted by Milky Doe | May 22, 2012, 23:47
  142. The AEC report was whether their Legislation had been breached. They mostly hadn’t and anyway the time limit for prosecution had expired. The HSU may have accidentally got something right. The two reports are almost entirely consistent with a particular course of conduct.

    Posted by Harry Won A Bagel | May 23, 2012, 0:01
  143. Thompson is a lying c…
    Just like Gillard

    Best thing he could do is neck himself

    Posted by Bart | May 23, 2012, 2:08
  144. Oakshott during his MPI yesterday mentioned vexnews, saying you cannot take reports in vexnews as facts. Gee hope no-one gets the impression we can rely on fairfax or news ltd for facts.

    Posted by Sue | May 23, 2012, 6:51
  145. I have been so upset the way Craig Thomson has been hounded guilty or not how cruel we dont want that sort of people to run this country Tony Abbott is no Christian he and his mob should hang his head in shame

    Posted by LC | May 23, 2012, 8:15
  146. Bart ! You are the typical low life piece of dog excrement that is precisely what is wrong with whole subject. The fact being everyone has the presumption of innocence until found guilty in a court of his or her peers. Not by being found guilty by trial by media or a political party under the protection of parliament desperately trying to force a change of government. How do you knoŵ he is lying ?? The answer is you don’t. Only those directly involved in the HSU over many years in a position of responsibility actually know who did what. The like of Williamson, Jackson, Thompson, and Bolano will hopefully soon all be forced to explain to a court where their innocence or guilt will be determined in a correct manner. And as for your comment he should neck himself well believe me, Karma is a wonderful thing !!!!!!

    Posted by The truth will come Out | May 23, 2012, 8:35
  147. ***the fact being everyone has the presumption of innocence until found guilty in a court of his or her peers***

    LOL. Remember Archbishop Hollingsworth?

    Posted by Byron in Wahroonga | May 23, 2012, 10:00
  148. The truth will come Out, see a psychiatrist you excitable apologist idiot.

    Posted by Anonymous | May 23, 2012, 10:34
  149. Gillard is a lying c… simple as that!

    Posted by Anonymous | May 23, 2012, 10:36
  150. To the mediator of this blog. Could you please raise the standard. What does the comment by Bart and Anonymous add to the debate other than to drag the level down into the gutter?

    Posted by LS | May 23, 2012, 11:59
  151. Dean you are no where to be seen in the NATIONAL ETU MAGAZINE every other state represented, but no victorian input.is that because you are next to go after CRAIG THOMSON. the penny has finally dropped you are the most corrupt union official in australia see you federal court july 31st.

    Posted by jimmy | May 23, 2012, 12:12
  152. Anonymous:~I guess I wouldn’t put my name to such a silly comment either. We can clearly see however you are a fan of the gutter press !

    Posted by shocked | May 23, 2012, 12:32
  153. Show me Thompson charged guilty in a court of law and I will then believe the rubbish I read.
    Jackson I believe is going through court actions, so why is she being believed, oh thats right I forgot her husband who also is Abbotts mate, is second in charge of the place the report come from…..
    OH and just by coincidence this report came out the week a great budget was handed down…….
    to many ugly sides to this story that will hopefully finally come out !

    Posted by shocked | May 23, 2012, 12:39
  154. @jimmy, there were a number of Vics in the National Magazine, Balta, Omar, Mier, that Jason Lynn grub. The Vics had a huge input. Oh the Setka Family featured as well. The reason Dean wasnt in it was coz Fat Howard told him it would be a bad look after bagging the Nat Office , causing the Union spend mega bucks to defend its processes and of COURSE to get him to open the books. in fact all will see that the self appointed working class hero is a lying thieving dog. so , as i said Mighell was told not to contribute

    Posted by miles gone | May 23, 2012, 13:01
  155. The only reason the ‘lynch’ mob has come out after Thompson is that there is a wide-spread impression among the public that the government has been doing everything it can to protect him (2-3 years for an investigation that everyone disowns now), delay any adverse findings and generally throw a spanner in the works. And thats what gets everyone’s gander up – when the elite, from either side or politics, try to protect their own and then try to feed shit to the mushrooms in the electorate.

    And spare a thought for those doing it tough, who can barely afford their unions fees, who vote for a labor party they hope will represent them strongly against companies and bosses who may try to exploit them and their weak situation. What do you say to them? Ignore the FWA report, here is a “Thompson is innocent” t-shirt, and can you please donate to his legal fund?

    Posted by Fredo | May 23, 2012, 13:06
  156. To all the Lie_beral fascists: There is no way Unionists are the most corrupt people.
    Corporate types the world over excel at corruption.

    It depends how far back into history you want to go. The first Ponzi scheme was perpetrated in Paris, involving the then French owned Louisiana, it helped bankrupt the French monarchy/government.

    More recently, Madoff, ENRON, GFC, etc. etc. Locally the list is also long, tens of thousands of people lost money in HIH, ONETEL, PYRAMID and hundreds of others. And the greatest laugh of all was when the Frazer/Howard government set up the Painters & Dockers Royal Commission to find fault and discredit Unions and ended up finding the Bottom of Harbour tax evasion scheme by… surprise, surprise, business types. All under the watch of that pig “HONEST JOHN”.

    Posted by Demase | May 23, 2012, 13:53
  157. Oh I can’t wait Big Tone has a special reward for my efforts in his trousers yum yum!

    Posted by Pissy Chryne | May 23, 2012, 14:13
  158. To Anonymous | May 23, 2012, 10:34….it must have taken you all of one hour to come up with that piteous response. Their is a saying that if you have nothing usefull to add to an argument than don’t pretend to be a fool and open you mouth (or in your case your PC ) as you will only confirm to other what a fool you really are. Well unfortunatley you have proven this saying and than some.

    Posted by Anon | May 23, 2012, 14:23
  159. Fredo, I hear that you are angry and you have every right to be upset at the misuse of HSU funds. But that does not give you the right to decide who is guilty of that crime. The FWA is an independent body, and unless you have proof that the Labor party saught to extend the time it took to do the investigation you are just conjecturing. There are serious allegations that Thomson denies. He is afforded the presumption of innocence, just like any other citizen. Why is that so difficult for you to understand. The alternative is we bring him down, stomp all over his rights, and pass judgement. Titt for Tatt. What if we are wrong? Or is that so hard for you to swallow?

    Posted by LS | May 23, 2012, 14:45
  160. The 2 Jacksons, Thomson , Williamson, Bolano, Hudson, Elliot all the same – the sooner they are all gone the better.

    Posted by Karma | May 23, 2012, 15:40
  161. Ask Rob Morrey about Bolano threating people or has he suddenly had a lose of memory

    Posted by Sub Branch President of 5 members at RMH | May 23, 2012, 15:42
  162. And Fegan!!

    Posted by Buffoon | May 23, 2012, 15:47
  163. Karma, you got that right. Birds of a feather.

    Posted by Jim | May 23, 2012, 17:51
  164. DEAN!!! i left out the national magazine EDITOR phil cleary oops a victorian.phil says in the mag, if you have a story that deserves to be run in the national magazine pls email him.SO I DID.i told him that the victorian state sectretary was corrupt he was aware of this.DEAN see you in federal court july 31st.

    Posted by jimmy | May 23, 2012, 18:00
  165. The Rev Hon Fred Nile MLC has raised further questions concerning the Offset Alpine Printing Company fire and the investors who profited from the $56 million payout.

    Mr Nile asked the following question in the NSW Upper House on Tuesday 22nd May 2012.

    Reverend the Hon. FRED NILE: I ask the Minister for Police and Emergency Services, representing the Premier and the Attorney General, a question without notice. Further to my question on 10 May concerning the investigation into the Offset Alpine Printing Ltd factory fire and the investors, is it a fact, as alleged in media reports, that the investors who benefited from the $53 million payout included the late René Rivkin, Trevor Kennedy, Rodney Adler—who authorised the payment—Sean Howard, Ray Martin, Graham Richardson and possibly Gordon Wood? Will the Minister ensure that these persons are investigated concerning any knowledge of the huge payout prior to the fire?

    The Hon. MICHAEL GALLACHER: I hear people saying that a name is missing from that list: Where there is smoke, there is Eddie. I will refer the question to the Attorney General. I am sure there will be an extensive examination of the media reports.

    Posted by Byron in Wahroonga | May 23, 2012, 18:31
  166. There is no way Unionists are the most corrupt people. Corporate types the world over excel at corruption.

    The first Ponzi scheme was perpetrated in Paris, involving the then French owned Louisiana, it helped bankrupt the French monarchy/government. More recently, Madoff, ENRON, GFC, etc. etc.

    Locally the list is also long, tens of thousands of people lost money in HIH, ONETEL, PYRAMID and hundreds of others. And the greatest laugh of all was when the Frazer/Howard government set up the Painters & Dockers Royal Commission to find fault and discredit Unions and ended up finding the Bottom of Harbour tax evasion scheme by… surprise, surprise, business types.
    All under the watch of “HONEST JOHN”.

    Posted by Demase | May 23, 2012, 18:45
  167. @Jimmy – you are evil

    Posted by Dog Rolling in Poo | May 23, 2012, 20:29
  168. I follow this not as a member of the HSU, but as the former husband of a HSU Victorian state secretary.

    My ex-wife was someone whose politics I’m keenly aware of from the early-eighties…but even though she’s no longer a part of the HSU, from what I read here her time is still remembered with some distaste.

    What I find most interesting about the whole current HSU debacle is the fact, as usual, you have right-wing people who are more likely to emasculate any effectiveness the union has and cause much division in it.

    I’m of the opinion my ex, Zora was one such case.

    It’s such a pity such people as her and Kathy Jackson seem more intent on serving agendas other than that of their members’ wellbeing.

    I am politically centrist myself and have been for years, but tend to think you always need a strong union movement as a counter-balance to the employer groups to have any semblance of fairness. That doesn’t happen when the unions have right-wingers causing division.

    Whatever the eventual resolution of all this current mess, I hope at least one lesson is learnt that the HSU should not have to constantly be a house divided.

    At least Zora failed to achieve a similar object in 2002. Sadly, it’s people after her who are now doing what I feel Zora was trying to do to the HSU No.1 Vic branch.

    Posted by George | May 23, 2012, 22:08
  169. My opinion on the Thomson stuff…I would not be surprised if he was stooged as he claims. I at least know from a technology point of view it IS possible for his mobile to be sim-copied and even spoofed.

    He’s allowed the presumption of innocence till PROVEN guilty. And I believe Kathy Jackson needs to explain the conflict of interest she has in her relationship to an FWA person before she goes throwing allegations around.

    Seriously…if there is corruption in the HSU, it’s not just on one side. And politics is always a dirty business. Which is why people like myself switch off to it and veer away from either extremes of it.

    But in this case…I don’t feel accusations thrown at Thomson and others are without bias from the opposite side of the political fence.

    Posted by George | May 23, 2012, 22:22
  170. guilty of Ms management the guy at the tops is ultimately responsable

    Posted by Freddy | May 23, 2012, 23:58
  171. For those among you that have enough sense to know that the presumption of innocence is a fundamental right or those that want to find out the REAL truth, there is a number of brilliant articles by Peter Wicks from Independent Australia connecting the dots to a lot of the KNOWN facts.
    For the mindless morons who just want to believe what is written and broadcast in the mainstream media, just go and climb back under your rock, if you can find room under there with Tony Abbot, Christopher stupid Pyne , the vast majority of the parliamentary liberal party, Kate Jackson, her cohorts and the aforementioned mainstream media.
    I, like the vast majority of people don’t know if Craig Thomson is guilty or innocent but despite its flaws I do believe in due process.
    By the way, the justification that Abbot and his cronies use to justify their push for power at any cost, is the same as is used by the terrorists that kill and maim innocent people and then name them martyrs for the cause, or collateral damage.
    they have just as many questions to answer as C T.

    Posted by Fedup | May 24, 2012, 0:00
  172. Who would be stupid enough to use union credit cards to pay for prostitutes knowing too well it could be traced back to him. I think craig has raised enough issues for deeper investigation.
    We have all relied on information from the media and made judgement upon that.
    Whatever happened to innocent til proven guilty

    Posted by Dan | May 24, 2012, 0:05
  173. Any new Anti-Corruption Commissioner would have to have rocks in their head to accept anything less than $270k, especially if the scope takes in claims regarding MPs, journos, Union officials, FWA Members and staff!

    FWA recently botched an investigation I requested. Simple complaint, a Union gives out the contact details of a de-registered member so that FWA can serve a Summons to witness for an Unfair Dismissal hearing. The witness told the Applicant (dismissed employee) and the Union months prior that the Summons had to be signed and stamped by FWA for them to attend. The Applicant, the Union and FWA all failed to heed the basic Summons requirements in plenty of time before the hearing so that the witness can give notice to the employer legitimately to attend. FWA staff leave a message on the witness’s home answering machine a day before the hearing and threaten that if they don’t turn up after being served the signed Summons by email, they will face imprisonment. The child of the witness listens to the answering machine message and is distressed. The witness returns from their fly-in-fly-out roster to find the email and the answering machine message. The Union failed to tell FWA that the witness was no longer on the Membership roll. FWA directed the Union to serve the Summons on its Member!! (why would you be a Union member if they are supposed to protect you and your privacy) When FWA were told it had no authority under its Rules to insist the Union serve the Summons by email because the witness was not on the Roll – everyone ducked. The result, the witness didn’t make it to the hearing, or the rescheduled hearing because FWA would not return calls to accommodate the witness, the witness didn’t go to prison, the child is still scarred, the findings don’t cover the facts and instead are a cover up for the Union & FWA acting in concert … the only reason the investigation findings were issued in the same year as the complaint was because I wrote to Bill Shorten stating I’d go to the media if it wasn’t investigated promptly.
    The smuggler asked the PM today – which one is more believable, the FWA findings or Thomson’s response to the findings … if Lawler, Abbott’s appointee or any of his mates had a hand in it, I’d say Thomson.

    Posted by HR PuffnStuff Society | May 24, 2012, 0:05
  174. Albo……… YOU are the hack.

    Posted by Anonski | May 24, 2012, 0:09
  175. freddy – ‘guilty of Ms management’ I hope your brain actually thinks that word is a combination of Ms and management. That would be brilliant. Hillary Ms spoke. Ms directed. Ms information. awesome!

    Posted by Anonymous | May 24, 2012, 0:09
  176. Part of the problem is he was born in New Zealand. You know where all those dole bludgers come from and infect Australia with dozens of kids (future dole bludgers)

    He was married to someone called Christa but married again to a PR adviser chick recently.

    He could not keep his first marriage together but perhaps Christa got sick of his brothel visits after all he could spread sexual diseases to her. I wonder how the new wife is feeling when having a marital root.

    Posted by Adrian Jackson | May 24, 2012, 0:13
  177. How many other anti-union activists has Rabbit appointed to FWA?

    Posted by silkworm | May 24, 2012, 0:28
  178. For anyone who thinks that Kate Jacksons is some sort of heroine, her evidence in a court of law would be less than credible, as she has been telling anyone that would listen that C Ts claims are delusional and unbelievable, yet when asked if she knew of any other HSU official that has had similar claims against them she stated without hesitation, a resounding NO.
    It must have slipped her mind that a certain Jeff Jackson had almost identical claims made against him at around the same time as CT, by the HSU.
    The strange thing is that Jeff Jackson is Kate Jacksons ex husband!
    You would have thought that she would have remembered that?

    Posted by Fedup | May 24, 2012, 0:31
  179. Silkworm, the answer is none.

    FWA was created by Rudd and Gillard so ALL appointments to FWA are ALP appointments.

    Posted by Anon | May 24, 2012, 0:45
  180. Anon, FWA is merely AIRC with a new badge. ALP has only had the last round of appointees. They usually appoint a few extra each year or so (due to attrition or workload need), and the govt of the day appoints. LNP has 16yrs worth of appointees still in there.

    Posted by HR PuffnStuff Society | May 24, 2012, 7:19
  181. FYI Anon, Michael Lawler, who is Kate Jackson’s current partner, is currently the second in charge of FWA, and was originally appointed to the Australian Industrial relations Commission not by labor, but by a certain Tony Abbot when he was the minister for destroying industrial relations.
    The long standing AIRC was changed to FWA by labor.
    Miss-information and downright lies are what is driving this debate, shame about the truth!
    Lawler is also reported to be a close friend of Tony Abbots, funny about that.
    Someone else who has many questions to answer.

    Posted by Fedup | May 24, 2012, 7:31
  182. When Abbott was IR Minister his view of IR was ‘having a bad boss is like having a bad father, you just have to wear it’! This is on the media record anyone can google it. Many ordinary Australians turned out to throw tomatoes at him after that comment. In his view it doesn’t matter if you do a bad job if you are Leader of a Party or a People.

    Posted by HR PuffnStuff Society | May 24, 2012, 7:35
  183. Jeff Jackson Kathys ex-husband ordered to pay back $22k by FWA. Whistleblowing much . Oh and of course didn’t bat a lid when Uhlman asked her nicely about anyone else who would have trousered money or used brothels at the “working poors’ expense on Live TV . Kathy needs to pay the legal bills somehow.

    Posted by Anon | May 24, 2012, 7:57
  184. i may be EVIL,but i am right DEAN is corrupt.270k chicken feed to dean.plus his entree of kick backs swags,first aid kits,printing companies,light bulbs,property portfolio bought with ETU money,motor bikes,gun collection.the working class hero.see you federal court july31st.

    Posted by jimmy | May 24, 2012, 9:15
  185. Upcoming interview with Kathy Jackson

    Interviewer: FWA is proceeding with charges against Jeff Jackson. What do you know about that?

    KJ: This is outrageous, ridiculous, and appalling. Jeff Jackson is a fabrication of my enemies.

    Interviewer: Thank you for clearing that up. Let me tell you how much I admire you Kathy. And how about telling us once again what an arsehole Thomson is.

    Posted by Seer | May 24, 2012, 9:28
  186. Business would like to get back to the days in the USA where if they had Union problems they would hired the Pinkerton Agency (private detectives/armed militia to provide agents that would infiltrate unions, to supply guards to keep strikers and suspected unionists out of factories, and sometimes to recruit goon squads to intimidate workers.

    The best known such confrontation was the Homestead Strike of 1892, in which Pinkerton agents were called in to enforce the strikebreaking measures of Henry Clay Frick, acting on behalf of Andrew Carnegie, who was abroad; the ensuing conflicts between Pinkerton agents and striking workers led to several deaths on both sides. The Pinkertons were also used as guards in coal, iron, and lumber disputes in Illinois, Michigan, New York, and Pennsylvania, as well as the Great Railroad Strike of 1877.

    Posted by Vance | May 24, 2012, 10:26
  187. What a disgusting post Adrian Jackson, not related to Kathy? There are a few questions about Kathy that do not sound quite right, why would she choose to address a right wing union busting organisation like H R Nicholls Society? Why would a union busting legal firm be chosen by her to represent her in a union busting burst of ‘innocence’.

    Posted by sara west | May 24, 2012, 10:34
  188. Further to Sara’s comment, why would the Liberals favourite Union busting law firm provide lawyers pro-bono to a union boss, when they were part of the think tank responsible for that wonderful piece of legislation called Work Choices?

    Posted by Fedup | May 24, 2012, 11:10
  189. @ Dog Rolling in Poo | May 23, 2012, 20:29

    I ahve come to the conclusion watching Jimmy’s rants here that he is not evil he is very ill. This obsession is not at all healthy in any way. I wonder how he is going to react when all these efforts come to nought. I just hope the obsession is not dangerous. I have my doubts.

    Posted by Anonymous | May 24, 2012, 11:49
  190. sara west – not disgusting at all just facts. I am of WASP (White Anglo Saxon Protestant) background and cant be and an not related to Kathy Jackson. Her maiden name is a wog name and I am not a wog.

    If she addresses the HR Nichols Society; so what? Hawke addresses the ACTU conference and sang a silly song; again so what?

    Posted by Adrian Jackson | May 24, 2012, 11:57
  191. Also Kathy Jackson’s former husband Jeff Jackson is no relation too.

    Posted by Adrian Jackson | May 24, 2012, 12:00
  192. Upcoming interview with Kathy Jackson

    Interviewer: FWA is proceeding with charges against Jeff Jackson. What do you know about that?

    KJ: This is outrageous, ridiculous, and appalling. Jeff Jackson is a fabrication of my enemies.

    Interviewer: Thank you for that. Moving on to Craig Thomson now….

    Posted by Seer | May 24, 2012, 13:05
  193. Who is Jeff Jackson?

    Posted by Anonymous | May 24, 2012, 13:07
  194. The fact is Lawler is never close to Abbott – he was appointed because of his father. The fact is Lawler never backs Liberal and he once said in public “Howard Government sucks”. He is kindhearted and known to have a soft spot for the poor and underprivileged. The fact is he is a changed man since having an affair with Kathy Jackson (yes they were both married).

    Posted by anon | May 24, 2012, 13:10
  195. Meanwhile, Michelle Grattan is being used as a sleazy mouthpiece by Tony Abbott’s mole in the privileges committee.

    Posted by Michelle | May 24, 2012, 13:31
  196. When Abbott was IR Minister his view of IR was ‘having a bad boss is like having a bad father, you just have to wear it’! This is on the media record anyone can google it. Many ordinary Australians turned out to throw tomatoes at him after that comment. In his view it doesn’t matter if you do a bad job if you are Leader of a Party or a People.

    Posted by HR PuffnStuff Society | May 24, 2012, 13:32
  197. Michael L is a very decent human being and shouldn’t be slagged off because of his association with KJ. But he may well have met his femme fatale.

    Posted by Anonymous | May 24, 2012, 13:33
  198. DEAN thanks for your concern.obsession,illness,all for nothing.you would not have to spend millions of members money if you had opened the victorian ETU books like you where directed to.but no! we have to go to federal court.as you will not open the books as you have something to hide.85% of the vic membership will shortly find out that you are corrupt,liar,thief time to be expelled.

    Posted by jimmy | May 24, 2012, 14:00
  199. Anonymous | May 24, 2012, 11:49 (Mighell) such sincere concern about Jimmys health. Maybe you should refute Jimmys claim that your own union is forcing you court so you have to show the accounts that you have responsibility for and that will pull him up in his tracks and settle Him down

    Posted by Your not welcome to Pat's funeral | May 24, 2012, 14:36
  200. Channel Nine has interviewed a prostitute who says young Craig was one of her clients. Seems the Indians are circling the wagon.

    Posted by Jim | May 24, 2012, 16:34
  201. We ALP voting, Irish background, work’in class, unemployed, gays like Craig Thomson.

    Posted by D. Neil | May 24, 2012, 16:42
  202. “If she addresses the HR Nichols Society; so what? Hawke addresses the ACTU conference and sang a silly song; again so what?”

    I’m not sure if this Adrian Jackson fellow is slow or delusional, but he couldn’t track an elephant in a snowstorm. Kathy Jackson addressing the HR Nicholls annual dinner is like Winston Churchill turning up at a Nuremburg rally and pouring himself a schnapps.

    Of course Hawke addressed the ACTU – he was it’s president for over ten years. Kathy Jackson claims to represent union members interests yet somehow is the honoured guest of their enemy, the HR Nicholls society. She is a sellout and the Thomson affair is a stitch up. She is scum.

    Posted by Mug Punter | May 24, 2012, 16:46
  203. D. Neil – And it’s low-life homophobic WASPS like you that are happy to have real sleaze bag like Heffernan representing you.

    REPORTER, JOHN LYONS: It’s the evening of March 12 this year, Bill Heffernan, the tough-talking farmer and the Prime Minister’s enforcer gets to his feet in an almost-abandoned Senate to make one of the most extraordinary speeches in the nation’s history.

    HEFFERNAN: I have also in my possession Comcar driver records which document and record the same judge using this taxpayer-funded service on a regular basis to pick up from an address known to the police in Clapton Place adjacent to Kings Cross, a young male and accompany him to the judge’s home address.

    The docket also notes the judge did not travel. The young male was returned unaccompanied.

    REPORTER: For 15 minutes Heffernan details the most serious possible allegations against an unnamed judge, knowing that Senate rules mean that he would be forced to sit down if he names any current member of the judiciary.

    ‘HEFFERNAN: Mr Acting Deputy President, earlier in this speech I referred to a judge who’s come to the attention of the New South Wales police who indiscreetly, improperly and illegally used Comcar, who regularly trawled for rough trade at the Darlinghurst Wall, who according to police statements and interviews regularly played out his fantasies in a fee-for-service arrangement.

    REPORTER: It is not until the last five words of the speech that he names the judge.’

    HEFFERNAN: In summary, a driver made allegations to me. I alerted the New South Wales Police. I asked the driver to speak to the New South Wales Police. He did so.

    PATTERSON: I hadn’t signed anything. I didn’t accuse Justice Kirby, and I didn’t sign anything to say that, anything to the contrary.

    HEFFERNAN: The driver continued to assert to me the information he had previously provided. At no time before late yesterday afternoon did the driver ever intimate to me even the slightest suggest that the material he had provided to me was anything other than completely authentic.

    PATTERSON: I’m sure he checked or he had some area that he did check with Comcar the auth… whether they were going to be original dockets. He knew that the dockets that I had supplied him actually weren’t authentic, they weren’t authentic.

    REPORTER: Patterson was furious that Heffernan pointed the finger of blame at him.

    PATTERSON: I think Senator Heffernan had a brain snap, and it would … just happened.

    Posted by Michelle | May 24, 2012, 16:53
  204. Too right Mug punter.

    Her court cases are nothing but a desperate attempt to retain her $270k obscene salary, nothing more. Nobody asks , nobody cares .By pointing the finger at Thomson she ensures she can keep on bleeding the unions funds dry for self preservation , while the punters all watch ACA. God forbid she spent that much on legal fees to help members conditions or pay!!!She doesn’t give a rats, she needs a lifestyle to maintain folks.

    Posted by Anon | May 24, 2012, 17:01
  205. From the The Weekend Australian – April 2009:

    “The statement of a Bendigo Gold Visa card allegedly issued to Jackson shows expenditure on services that fall far outside his normal duties. It includes a string of prostitutes, designer clothes, dental work, gourmet food and drinks at a favourite Melbourne hotel. Jackson challenges the authenticity of this credit card account and dismisses allegations he has misused any funds as part of a “dirty tricks campaign” mounted by opponents within his union…”

    Of course, Kathy Jackson may have not remembered this case, as it was a while ago. Except for one minor detail — the person apparently set up, Jeff Jackson, happens to be her ex-husband. ???? Uhlman should have bought this up in the 7.30 interview when she scoffed off whether anyone lese she knows has been accused of going to brothel.

    Posted by Scrutiny on Accuser please | May 24, 2012, 17:08
  206. yes…another up standing member…

    Posted by anon | May 24, 2012, 17:24
  207. I love to see a ‘Member’ standing up.

    Posted by Pissy Chryne | May 24, 2012, 17:39
  208. Posted by anon | May 24, 2012, 13:10, Now come now Kathy !!!! Do you think us all that stupid that you right this comment about your bed buddy and by authoring as Anon, that that hides the true identity of the writer. My dera Kathy, you really have no shame do you. You have almost single handedly brought down the HSU, albeit with some help from Williamson and Thompson and in fact possible affected the union movement in an adverse way which will take years to rebuild the true faith of the country. A movement that has taken hundreds of hours over many years by hundreds of hard working male and female union officials before you, officials who strongly believe in the roles of unions and the benefits a noon delivers. You should hang our head in shame and all those who side with you like dumb fuck Marco who can’t think or talk for himself without getting our approval. I would be ashamed to show my face in public if I were you. But alas, you have no sole , no character, no integrity, and I pity your children being mothered by a cretin like you. Take the hundreds of thousands , possibly millions of dollars you have rorted ( along with others being fair ) of hard working members money and pack your bags and leave the country.

    Posted by The truth will come Out | May 24, 2012, 17:44
  209. Andy,
    You must be kidding.
    If you believe this was a “strong account” and not a delusional rant with more holes in the story than Swiss cheese then I would love to buy a kilo of whatever it is that you are on.

    Posted by Bill Calvin | May 24, 2012, 18:03
  210. To Kathy Jackson & other HSU corrupt management – you must be fucking desperate. You send in your heavy’s to do your dirty work to pressure a HSU member to say things that are not true in order to save your arses. Then you go report this to the media, give them this person’s personal details and the media hasstles this member relentlessly. Leave that person alone you fucking arseholes. You are all lower than shark shit. Fight your own battles – you caused them, so suck it up!!

    Posted by Nini10 | May 24, 2012, 18:27
  211. Channel 9 is reported to be about to pay a prostitute $60,000 for claiming to have fornicated with Thomson. That amount of money is enough to attract Kathy. No, she wouldn’t, would she ? Then again …

    Posted by Michelle | May 24, 2012, 18:36
  212. Reports are that Nine drove out to show Thomson the interview prior to its broadcast, but Thomson wouldn’t watch it. Curios behavior from somebody with nothing to hide.

    I’d say that any man wrongly accused by a prostitute would want to see her and hear what she had to say. But not young Craig. Can’t face it, eh?

    Posted by Jim | May 24, 2012, 18:45
  213. Mug Punter – Anyone who does not use her name is suspect.

    Posted by Adrian Jackson | May 24, 2012, 19:02
  214. Craig Thomson was pathetic on TV today . “leave me alone” and “enough is enough” etc. Thomson you are going to be hounded until you die you ALP crook.

    Posted by Adrian Jackson | May 24, 2012, 19:05
  215. He visited me but he was a dud shag

    Posted by "Misty" | May 24, 2012, 19:09
  216. As I have stated here before I have appeared in AIRC/FWA before Lawler and he is a totally decent and honest human being. Compassionate, clever, decent, reads between the lines of a situation. Just the kind of person you want at such a tribunal. I am not at all surprised that he was appointed to such a high level position and I hope he long remains there.

    Posted by Anonymous | May 24, 2012, 19:29
  217. No wonder Thomson is panicking. ACA appears to have incontrovertible proof of his paying an escort via his HSU credit card. And it seems they have the hooker, too.

    ACA spent 90 minutes with Thomson in his Canberra office outlining everything they had.

    Thomson’s impromptu media blast today reminds me of those old westerns: when the baddie runs out of bullets he throws his gun at the camera.

    Today, Thomson threw his gun at the camera.

    Posted by Jim | May 24, 2012, 19:57
  218. Hi The truth will come out – story to disappoint you but I’m not KJ. Read my post again! I agree with all you said about KJ but I stood by what I said about Michael Lawler.

    Posted by anon | May 24, 2012, 20:40
  219. The ALP used to be a cream of the working class but now its the dregs of the middle class

    Posted by Adrian Jackson | May 24, 2012, 21:09
  220. Posted by Sue | May 24, 2012, 21:21
  221. How come my comments are not getting posted all of a sudden. No swearing of homophobia. What gives Andy?

    Posted by Bill Calvin | May 24, 2012, 21:28
  222. Adrian Jackson, I’m not sure it was the cream, but it certainly was identifiably representative of the working class.

    The fact that the ALP is increasingly irrelevant to blue collar workers is reflected in its shrinking membership. As the population ages its branches are disappearing all over the map.

    It might as well change its name to the Alternative Conservative Party.

    Posted by Jim | May 24, 2012, 21:38
  223. Jim – spot on. A party that does not want to change and live in the past is a conservative party and the ALP is more conservative that the Liberals.

    But the Liberals are having a membership crisis too. In Victoria the average age of a member is 65 last time I heard which was a few years ago. When you look at the state councils and national conferences of both parties on TV the attendances get thinner and thinner each year.

    Posted by Adrian Jackson | May 24, 2012, 22:28
  224. “Misty” you stay away from my client

    Posted by "Mistress Helga" | May 24, 2012, 22:33
  225. Adrian, I agree that the Libs have a similar membership problem. I guess it won’t be too long before we’ll be hiring out of work actors to represent us in parliament. (Some would say we have already reached that point.)

    Posted by Jim | May 24, 2012, 22:54
  226. Anon, your defence of Lawler is touching although I doubt that Carol Glen would have such kind words for him, and it is interesting that, since Friday, he has gone on “Long Leave” after some interesting information about his possible conflict of interest was made public by K J.
    Jeff Jackson as mentioned earlier is K Js ex husband.
    For those that think that ACAs story is a smoking gun, you should first realise that a Prostitute has sold everything that she has already, so obviously money is a big incentive, but more importantly the credit card statement that they showed actually may have helped prove his innocence, as Peter Wicks’ article “Thomson under the rain” showed a photo of the credit card imprint used as forensic evidence against Thomson, in the original defamation case,
    and the imprint clearly shows that the name on the card was Thompson with a ‘P’ not Thomson, which is the name on the statement shown on ACA tonight.
    A friend that worked for Visa for a number of years told me tonight that the card used was almost certainly not the card provided by the the bank as the names on both would be spelt the same , either both with the ‘P’ or both without.
    Good work ACA!

    Posted by Fedup | May 24, 2012, 23:05
  227. Jim – some parties hire students now to hand out HTV cards on election day. They get then from the CES for a day.

    All elections would be better if it was all postal voting like for most council elections in Victoria. This would make it a level playing field for all candidates at least initially.

    Posted by Adrian Jackson | May 24, 2012, 23:33
  228. I find it really distasteful and discriminatory when Thomson and the media refers to ‘Sex workers’ as “Hookers” or “Prostitutes” it is really poor form and I am sick of it.

    Posted by Anonymous | May 24, 2012, 23:34
  229. Anonymous, is that really you or somebody pretending to be you?

    Look up the English dictionary where you’ll find, hooker, prostitute and whore, trollop, harlot, and many other words for the same thing.

    Your “sex worker” is simply political newspeak for the oldest profession known: giving sex in return for money.

    As the hookers what they call their clients. I’ll bet it’s not sex purchaser. LOL!

    Posted by Jim | May 24, 2012, 23:49
  230. Kathy Jackson and Michael Lawler spotted having coffee with Chris Pyne – interesting conversation I’m sure

    Posted by Anon | May 24, 2012, 23:56
  231. Adrian, it occurs to me that we could simply outsource parliament to India.

    Posted by Jim | May 25, 2012, 0:04
  232. “Kathy Jackson and Michael Lawler spotted having coffee with Chris Pyne – interesting conversation I’m sure”

    I’d rather hear of Craig Thomson being spotted having coffee with the head of Centrelink’s outplacement services.

    Posted by Jim | May 25, 2012, 0:12
  233. He has a smelly crutch but he pays well. $770 during one client service

    Posted by "Misty" | May 25, 2012, 0:12
  234. Well, Misty, you ought to ring ACA and see what they’ll pay you to describe his crutch on camera. Should be able to top $770 I’d reckon.

    Posted by Jim | May 25, 2012, 0:22
  235. I am Chryne with a ‘y’. Some people think I’m a little camp, but mostly I’m erratic!
    So remember I’m Chryne with a ‘y’!!

    Posted by Pissy Chryne | May 25, 2012, 0:26
  236. Jim, that outsourcing of Parliament to India is a great idea, while on the supject also we should outsource those ant-working class of, I hate to call them Labor apparathicks.

    Posted by Taliban fan | May 25, 2012, 0:28
  237. Alan often does ‘lovely’ things with my ‘little member’ after I visit his studio!!

    Posted by Pissy Chryne | May 25, 2012, 0:28
  238. Jim, that outsourcing of Parliament to India is a great idea, while on the subject also we should outsource those anti-working class of, I hate to call them Labor apparathicks.

    Posted by Taliban fan | May 25, 2012, 0:32
  239. Taliban fan, I’d prefer to hand them over to the Taliban, who would of course have the right of refusal.

    Posted by Jim | May 25, 2012, 0:34
  240. I think I’ve pulled it off, thanks to Craig Thomson. I might now get back to screwing the young hairdresser and Dirty Donna on the side.

    Posted by G Shaw | May 25, 2012, 0:36
  241. When will HSU stop paying salary to Jackson and Williamson? While MW is stood down with pay, KJ is on her $270k salary for hanging out with the Libs and appearing on TV/radio. I wonder if she claims any travel allowance from the union.

    Posted by Anon | May 25, 2012, 1:16
  242. I think the only way to cease payments for KJ and MW, is to put the HSU into administration, thereby making the former HSU executives redundant.

    I expect we’d then see obscene redundancy payments doled out.

    Posted by Jim | May 25, 2012, 1:29
  243. Apparently, the prostitute in question is going to have her identity disguised in the interview. Now THAT’s cowardly.

    I sincerely hope other media outlets *cough* Vexnews *cough* name her.

    Posted by Benny | May 25, 2012, 1:43
  244. Benny, I agree entirely. The hooker, who I gather is “retired” from the game, should be named if she’s to have any credibility. I reckon you could probably get any hooker off the street to say anything about anybody for a few grand.

    Posted by Jim | May 25, 2012, 2:09
  245. Ms Jackson told the Supreme Court that her office as executive president of the state union is full-time paid position and she would lose her livelihood if she was removed from office as a result of the state proceedings.

    Posted by Scrutiny on Accuser please | May 25, 2012, 8:21
  246. Justice Lawler is the partner of Kathy Jackson, the national secretary of the HSU and Mr Thomson’s chief accuser. In his speech, Mr Thomson implied Justice Lawler should have stepped aside during the investigation to avoid a conflict of interest. “The questions Fair Work Australia has to answer, the questions the deputy president has to answer are: what influence did he have in relation to the writing of the report?”

    Posted by Scrutiny on Accuser please | May 25, 2012, 8:25
  247. Of course she is in a full-time paid position – if she said she was an Elected Officer of the Union (which she is) she would be immediately stood aside with the rest of the Executive when an Administrator is appointed.
    That would mean she would lose her livelihood – poor thing!
    Just so long as Kathy is ok – don’t worry about everybody she has screwed along the way.

    Posted by Anon | May 25, 2012, 9:04
  248. Isn’t she on a LNP retainer to bring Thomson down?

    Posted by Anon | May 25, 2012, 9:56
  249. Absolutely possible – anything for money

    Posted by Anon | May 25, 2012, 10:26
  250. HR Nicholls gig & pro bono legals same as Ashby’s.

    Posted by Rocket scientist | May 25, 2012, 10:32
  251. I see that Anon is replying to his/her own questions. How clever.

    Posted by Jim | May 25, 2012, 11:10
  252. Let’s hope the courts aren’t added to Kathy Jackson’s list of dupes as she tries to settle herself in to a position to take over from those she’s smeared. Wanting to maintain her position and salary while the ruins of the HSU , the trade union movement and an elected government are still smoking is the ultimate in chutzpah (like murdering your parents then asking a court for clemency on the grounds that you are an orphan). Taking out the Thomsons and Williamsons on the grounds that they are alleged crooks might be laudable. But not differentiating between the crooks and the innocent, and using a media blitz to take out the human infrastructure of the whole union including a whole pile of innocent, hard working people, to ensure her own advancement, is beyond the pale and just plain wrong.

    Posted by Anonymous | May 25, 2012, 11:23
  253. I think the only way forward for the Hopelessly Screwed-over Union is to let the members decide its future by tossing out the entire executive and having fresh elections.

    Posted by Jim | May 25, 2012, 12:02
  254. So, the in latest installment of Thommo Today, we have allegations that he operated an Amex card slipped to him by a union contractor. “American Express: don’t leave the brothel without it.”

    Posted by Jim | May 25, 2012, 12:04
  255. Age ‘journalist’, Kate McClymont cannot be trusted. In her recent article on a private investigator in Sydney in which she strung a slew of ‘facts’ togther to reach a conclusion failed to disclose that McClymont’s live-in partner is also a private investigator in direct competition to the subject of her scorn.

    McClymont prints any nutter’s claims as afct-as she did in the above story when she printed a disaffected customer’s bizarre claims of evidence of mis-deeds when in fact the Dept of Fair Trading NSW and the District Court had both thrown out the nutter’s claims.
    McClymont is Fairfax’s chief muckraker long on sensation but short on facts.

    Posted by Jack | May 25, 2012, 12:15
  256. Craig take the easy way out

    Posted by Greg Wilton's ghost | May 25, 2012, 12:46
  257. Gillard just fix it. We are sick of hearing about this bogan

    Posted by Adrian Jackson | May 25, 2012, 12:47
  258. Gillard won’t be doing anything more than she has done. She and he are strapped to the same stick of gelignite. If he goes, so does she.

    Posted by Jim | May 25, 2012, 13:13
  259. Meanwhile Media Slags like Michelle Grattan, who has probably never seen a penis let alone touch one, get on their moralistic high horse while poofter haters like Hefernan get away with anything.

    Posted by Michelle | May 25, 2012, 13:28
  260. “I sincerely hope other media outlets *cough* Vexnews *cough* name her.”
    I agree Benny.
    It will make it so much easier for the Sussex St heavies to send someone up North to break her legs.

    Posted by Crocodile Tears Craig of Dobell | May 25, 2012, 13:31
  261. Leave me alone.
    I might top meself!!!!

    Posted by Crocodile Tears Craig of Dobell | May 25, 2012, 13:32
  262. Was Mark Riley really perving on Craig’s missus in the shower?

    If so, that is a bit wrong Mark.

    I have some experience entering rooms via the window to the surprise of naked occupants.

    Posted by Slippery Pete | May 25, 2012, 13:34
  263. Nine’s tell-all girl is reportedly offshore.

    The only brink that Thomson’s being brought to is the one where he has to tell truth for the first time in his life.

    He hasn’t got the moral spine to top himself.

    Posted by Jim | May 25, 2012, 13:39
  264. Slippery Pete, you omitted to mention your habit of urinating out of said windows.

    Posted by Jim | May 25, 2012, 13:41
  265. “Government whip Joel Fitzgibbon told The Age: ‘Craig Thomson has been treated worse than Ivan Milat'”

    Milat, denied any wrongdoing, too. Still does.

    I’d suggest that Fitzy take his whip to Thommo, except that Thommo may enjoy it.

    Posted by Jim | May 25, 2012, 14:03
  266. I guess when and if Nine puts the hooker interview to air, poor old Thommo will be dying to say: “I did not have sexual relations with that woman” … except, unfortunately, that’s already been used.

    Posted by Jim | May 25, 2012, 14:55
  267. I happy to pay Union sub so Craig can have happy ending.
    It worth it for me.

    Posted by Marina de Cleaner | May 25, 2012, 15:41
  268. Would I take a prostitute at her word?
    Usually not.
    Would I take the postitute’s word over that of a thieving union hack?

    Sorry Craigy boy.

    Posted by Concerned Granny of Cranbourne | May 25, 2012, 15:43
  269. “I did not have sexual relations with that woman”
    “Don’t worry – they’re only cold sores”
    “The cheques in the mail mate”
    “Of course I’ll love you in the morning”
    “I dunno how that got in me boogie board bag”
    “Marco set me up”

    Posted by Pants on Fire of Dobell | May 25, 2012, 15:47
  270. Why all the fuss.
    The Altona Droner is the Ancient Mariner and Craig is the albatross.

    They’re both fuc/ked like a high-class whore at an ACTU Congress

    Posted by Pants on Fire of Dobell | May 25, 2012, 15:50
  271. ^ What high-class whore would show up to an ACTU Congress?

    Posted by Jim | May 25, 2012, 16:23
  272. Pants on fire of dobell – you’re Christopher Pyne aren’t you. That prissy, snivelling weasel who suffers from constant verbal diarrhoea. A liar who uses far too much makeup. A real tosser. You said you didn’t send those emails to Ashby. Liar! Put a turd in a $3000 suit and you end up with a well dressed effeminate turd called Pyne.

    Posted by Michelle | May 25, 2012, 16:38
  273. Jim – methinks whores of any class would knock you back.

    Posted by Michelle | May 25, 2012, 16:43
  274. Michelle, when it comes to advice on whores, I’ll accept yours every time because I’d never dispute the word of a working girl.

    Posted by Jim | May 25, 2012, 16:49
  275. Then Jim believe this.

    For $60,000, a bag over your head and sock in your mouth I’d consider giving you a helping hand.

    Although you’re probably self-administering when you write your offensive stuff here.

    Posted by Michelle | May 25, 2012, 17:28
  276. Hey Jack – interesting I wonder if McClymonts live-in is the same sleuth ‘hired’ by Jackson and Lawler to ‘uncover’ the corruption of Williamson and co. Perhaps that would explain the very one sided reporting. Maybe we could hire him to uncover Jackson’s years of rorting and see if there is a change in the reporting when money is involved.

    Posted by Anon | May 25, 2012, 17:37
  277. Michelle, sounds like you’ve had lots of practice, what with the bags and socks. Can’t argue with your experience. You da girl.

    Posted by Jim | May 25, 2012, 17:40
  278. Senator wants taxpayers to cover assault costs. The lawyer for South Australian Liberal Senator Mary Jo Fisher has asked an Adelaide court to award his client legal costs after she was found guilty of assault.

    Ms Fisher was found guilty of assaulting a female security officer at the Foodland shopping centre at Frewville in Adelaide’s eastern suburbs in December 2010.

    Posted by Michelle | May 25, 2012, 17:41
  279. Jim – yes Jim and plenty of experience with sleazes like you. I used to take them all on.

    My one rule now is the client has to have opposed thumbs, which unfortunately for you Jim, means that will have to look elsewhere for you jollies. May I suggest the primate-keeper in your loal zoo.

    Posted by Michelle | May 25, 2012, 17:48
  280. Cancel his Australian citizenship and send him back to NZ so he can shag sheep instead

    Posted by Adrian Jackson | May 25, 2012, 17:53
  281. Adrian, now that’s the best suggestion to date. I was about to suggest that he bed down with Michelle, but she’d come second to a sheep I guess.

    Posted by Jim | May 25, 2012, 17:56
  282. The question has been asked why would a high-class whore attend ACTU conference. i thought it might have been for the outgoing DEAN MIGHELL, but then i remember his into shegirls he got the taste for them in london with coward worthless and his son paid by the ETU.

    Posted by jimmy | May 25, 2012, 20:16
  283. Michelle, isn’t it easy to beat up on Jim (and perhaps deservedly so). Doesn’t change the fact you’re a deluded ALP stooge.

    Christopher Pyne has more talent in the knob of his penis, than the entire Labor caucus put together. I use his pecker as a metaphor, because he is f**king your heroes in fine fashion.

    Posted by Anonymous | May 25, 2012, 20:55
  284. Can anyone give me any feedback on Neranto 8 & Neranto 10 i heard they give industrial advice. Any good ??

    Posted by anon | May 25, 2012, 21:28
  285. Labor couldn’t organize a root in a brothel…..I think that notion has been debunked well and truly….several times over too it seems!

    Posted by Benito M Hipster | May 25, 2012, 23:42
  286. Root in a brothel? Can I help?

    Posted by Wenchy | May 25, 2012, 23:53
  287. Look Mr Thompson, I can feel your pain on a live TV. Man don’t cry for nothing.You should name those faceless men who set you up. I don’t know you at all, In my opinion, there is no such things in politics.
    SO CALLED FRIENDS… WHEN SHIT HAPPENS the only friends will be there for you is your own FAMILY.

    Posted by an observer | May 25, 2012, 23:53
  288. Benito, not only that, they’ve worked out how to get somebody else to pay for it … on a MasterCard. Priceless.

    Posted by Jim | May 26, 2012, 0:11
  289. I’ll root you for free or a small donation to my campaign funds. The term ‘small donation’ reminds me of that common little man Boofa!

    Posted by Wenchy | May 26, 2012, 0:11
  290. I agree with Vexnews.

    In politics, if someone throws mud at you, the dumbest thing is to just stand there like a stupid dork while the mud dries on your face sticking there for all to see.

    You wipe the mud off as quickly and surreptitiously as you can, you then grab a nice round ball of mud and throw some back and say “look at that muddy person over there”.

    Given the media has the attention span of a goldfish, the new mud replaces old mud rule works all the time. The best way to bury an embarrassing headline about yourself is to give the media a bigger headline about your opponents.

    There’s plenty of juicy stuff every political party has about the other side. When one of yours is being taken down, take down one of theirs. After a few political character assassinations, the designated emissaries meet in some dark corner and solemnly swear never to wage war again and there is a short period of peace until some twit breaks the truce.

    The HSU is being vilified by the Union movement – bad move for the Unionists who are being ever so puritanical in their zeal to show their relative integrity. There are plenty of scandals in other unions that have been hushed up for the good of the movement.

    I suspect the HSU leadership (whose members presumably include the people who wheel the trolleys of dead people to the hospital morgue) knows where some of the most disgustingly dismembered bodies are buried and will be digging up those rotting carcasses for all to behold. Tit for tat. Tit for tat.

    Posted by Giuseppe De Simone | May 26, 2012, 0:21
  291. So how did the Jacksons manage to tender engage a company called Neranto 10 at the HSU (of which they were both Directors) between 1994 and 2008 , and still receive salaries from the HSU? Is that not what Kathy is accusing Williamson of? Hmmm something not right.

    Posted by anonymous | May 26, 2012, 9:13
  292. Near to sounds like a fantasy dreamed up by someone

    Posted by Stop dreamin | May 26, 2012, 9:21
  293. Neranto is a horse isnt’t it??

    Her’s a trifecta tip for you

    Neranto 11
    Neranto 10
    Neranto 8

    put your house on it

    Posted by anonymous | May 26, 2012, 9:44
  294. Check out independent Australia – Thomson and Jackson 5: Sticky Fingers.
    Apparently they have documents that show Ms Jackson may have misused a considerable amount of Vic 3 members money.

    Posted by Anon | May 26, 2012, 9:44
  295. This is starving the Fed Govt of oxygen so they cant get their messages across.They are stupid by attacking Abbott as it keeps it alive. Let it go dont mention it take the knocks and push your message. They are playing into Abbotts and Louchnanes hands.
    Who is advising the PM
    Trust Mother she needs a better advisor, remember if it looks like a GRUB and moves like a Grub it may be a ….

    Posted by Mother | May 26, 2012, 10:51
  296. Read the story about Neranto, so what, show the docs or shut up!

    Posted by Kathy is a working mum | May 26, 2012, 10:58
  297. A working mum on $270k with a company car/phone etc who only does media appearances now – when was the last time she worked for the members who pay her wage?

    Posted by Anon | May 26, 2012, 11:16
  298. Wonder if Marco Bolano received any payments from Neranto?

    Posted by Questions to be asked | May 26, 2012, 12:29
  299. @ Your not welcome to Pat’s funeral | May 24, 2012, 14:36

    Get it right it is not the CEPU taking Mighell to the Federal Court it is the ‘Kangaroo Court’ of the ETU, the ones who have the most to lose from the Victorian ETU’s multiple actions against the NSW Branch. We totally understand that the ALP want the affiliation fees back, we totally understand that the NSW Branch wants to retain both its state registration and lack of accountability to the national membership, we totally understand that various ‘colourful characters’ in this little show have a hell of a lot of conflicts and they owe allegiances all over the place except to members. We totally understand that Jimmy’s rants are all part of the ‘throw enough mud and hope it sticks’ effort, an effort started during the ETU elections. It then went quiet, and now in an Abbott like approach the screeching and screaming starts again as the noose starts to tighten around the necks of those who have the most to lose and nothing to gain. Despite the campaign some of us in the CEPU membership are prepared to wait for the truth and I think many will be sprayed with the blowback of the shit they are slinging eh Jimmy.

    Posted by Not Mighell | May 26, 2012, 12:49
  300. Kathy and Marco are clearly national hero’s fighting evil and defending justice!!!

    Posted by Aussie hero's | May 26, 2012, 12:55
  301. Craig Thomson should volunteer for military service in Afghanistan as a mine detecting dog. I understand he likes being on all fours with a leash around his neck.

    Posted by Adrian Jackson | May 26, 2012, 13:24
  302. Wonder what Allan Jones will say when he finds out he has been mislead? Kathy may be just about to find out.

    Posted by Mr Jones won’t be happy | May 26, 2012, 13:32
  303. Why is this woman so untouchable??? I wonder if Williamson got advice on how to set up Canme form Kathy’s Narento 10 business?? No wonder she could smell corruption she had already been there and done it.

    Posted by HSU Member | May 26, 2012, 13:32
  304. Would that be the Alan Jones arrested in a London public toilet?

    Posted by Jim | May 26, 2012, 13:40
  305. Leave Alan alone, before his crook prostrate made him impotent he was always the pillar behind me.

    Posted by Pissy Chryne | May 26, 2012, 15:02
  306. Wonder what Justice Flick will say when Kathy states she is a full time employee of the union who will lose her livelihood.
    Seems she may have helped herself to some extra just in case?
    She is probably wishing there wasn’t a week before the hearing resumes. What will come out in that period.

    Posted by Anon | May 26, 2012, 15:42
  307. Sitting quietly trying to stay out of the spotlight. What will her ex say now he has been dragged in again. Well done Kathy!

    Posted by Poor Jeff | May 26, 2012, 15:44
  308. Hey HSU member, maybe no so untouchable now. Wonder how much she has really taken.

    Posted by Anon | May 26, 2012, 15:50
  309. One can only hazzard a guess. Now she doesn’t even have the 80,000 from the HESTA Borad as that money must now go to the Union. But don’t worry she could always bring Neranto out of mothballs and start consulting again.

    Posted by HSU Member | May 26, 2012, 16:02
  310. Gym fees, childcare fees, volvo and now her own companies Neranto wtf??? fleecing the “working poor” ON TOP of her obscene salary of $270k. Kathy ain’t no working mother she’s an enterprise. Where’s the EBA????

    Posted by paid up fleeced Victorian member*** | May 26, 2012, 16:03
  311. Just how many incarnations has neranto consultancies had? ASIC has up to date info but there are many that are inactive , how may times has her company invoiced HSU?? Surely the ATO company records can be accessed for forensic examination.

    Sickening to my core to think some one who shamefully calls themselves a “whistleblower” & “Unionist” double dipped into hard earnt union funds.

    I hope strike force carnarvon and the FWA ensure they have also investigated these anomalies in what appears and emerging and sad picture of wide scale missapropriation activity before the Victorian branch merged.

    Posted by Beyond contempt | May 26, 2012, 16:11
  312. What with all their socks, bags, sheep and ignorance jim and adrian jackson should just get a room. Bring new meaning to hard Right :P

    Posted by keyboard comedians | May 26, 2012, 16:46
  313. Can someone lend me a shredder I’m in more shit than a Werribee Duck: the ATO, that young horny hairdresser, ex wife, Ted, the Speaker, bloody local losers who want my help. Hey Dirty Donna can you give me just one more to help me destress?

    Posted by G Shaw | May 26, 2012, 18:43
  314. Oh no, your in big trouble Kaffy.

    Posted by Barco Molano | May 26, 2012, 18:59
  315. While being an MP is not a 9-5 job and while I don’t mind if a MP does a bit of private work in their business office during the day (farmer MP’s do it too), using other peoples money (taxpayer or union) for personal or business activities is not on. Both Thomson and Shaw look and behave a bit dodgy

    Posted by Adrian Jackson | May 26, 2012, 19:03
  316. Like all allegations against Kathy they will come to nothing.

    Posted by The voice of truth | May 26, 2012, 19:04
  317. Wonder if HR Nicolls paid up front. If so they might have trouble getting her to return the fee.

    Posted by Anon | May 26, 2012, 19:21
  318. Can someone please pass on the evidence to Investigators and FWA & MSM. Suddenly Thomson’s story has taken on a whole new clarity.

    Remember the ones that try and paint you mad , bad and evil have their hands vested deep in someone elses pockets.

    Let the truth emerge.

    Posted by anonymous | May 26, 2012, 19:24
  319. Hey Katrina & Ted are you sure you want to put your names forward for the Exec positions in the HSU when the admistrator calls for an election? Will Kathy and Marco be running you campaign team like the messers Williamson will be running Bob Hull’s Campagin??? I say they all need to be sent as far as possible away from the HSU and members money!!!!!

    Posted by HSU Member | May 26, 2012, 19:51
  320. Not making light of mental illness, but Ms Jackson might “hide from the media” and avoid scrutiny and questioning with a other “stint” in the Alfred and day now.

    Posted by Anon | May 26, 2012, 20:37
  321. I got you another shovel Kaffy.

    Posted by Braco Molano | May 26, 2012, 20:39
  322. Marco, hope you have some friends in prison that protect Kaffy.

    Posted by Anon | May 26, 2012, 20:47
  323. Perhaps KJ made a mistake and really meant to call the website cleanOUT-HSUeast!

    Posted by Pick Pocket | May 26, 2012, 21:06
  324. The Jacksons represent another faction of the HSU fighting over the rich spoils of office. Kathy Jackson is the present HSU national secretary, but has in recent times lacked the confidence of the Williamson faction, about whom she is now a ”whistleblower”. Her claims of complete moral purity might be more credible if she did not have a history in union affairs when her former husband Jeff, was the Victorian branch secretary. All outsiders always insist they are acting only on behalf of the members, and she is no exception. In bodies such as the HSU actual corruption – in the sense of witting diversion of money to one’s own interests – is usually preceded by a corruption of the spirit. Thinking the best interests of the membership come from becoming entrenched in power, and in resisting the entry of those who want entry into the cosy club. A reason to fill the office with relations, mates, and others so interlocked with other power groups that betrayals have serious consequences. Nothing should be too good for the workers, or the workers’ representatives.

    Read more: http://www.watoday.com.au/opinion/politics/whos-pulling-whose-string-20120522-1z33k.html#ixzz1vyBLVrLq

    Posted by wise words | May 26, 2012, 21:19
  325. Thomsom is a useless, inept, clown and has made labor and all union members look like losers.
    The hookers are coming forward and will have no trouble identifying the little pink priapism, more credit cards are on with other hookers are now being revealed with further evidence. What a stupid man.
    And the red queen bleeds, sells out the workers to allow 1,700 migrants to work for the worlds richest woman in the mines.
    You (most if you) voted labor. You got sucked in, they are useless, inept, couldn’t organize a root in a brothel literally.
    A PM that herself jointly theived from the AWU (the Bruce Morton Wilson affair), a Tafe lecturer for a treasury that has squandered billions, chooks Albanese and Roxon out if their depth, Emerson something out of yes minister, a mad as a snake lesbian fanatic in finance, a clutch of working class warriors, and a coven of green butters plus some self indulgent independents who will all go in the coming cleanout. Thomson is like a cold sore on the mouth of a now old, smelly, ugly ex beauty queen, yet another reminder that they had their moment but it’s over and behind them now. I hope Thomson enjoys the sex he will be getting when he does time for perjury and criminal acts.

    Posted by Bob | May 27, 2012, 2:12
  326. Crucify him, crucify him…

    Besides if he passes by we would win control of the house.. We pledge that should we do so we will imediately put in place the required steps to hold a double dissolution election and allow the people of Australia to elect us o a greater majority putting an end to this sorrid parliament of division.

    I will need to read the Electorial Act as I think there is serious penalties for trying to persuade a member of Parliament to resign or not stand for office.

    Posted by Tony Pyne | May 27, 2012, 6:45
  327. This must be the only place on earth where Thomson and our disgraceful Federal Govt. are being defended! Evidence that most commentators here are stooges of the ALP kind.

    As for the extraordinary attacks on Jackson and the conspiracies raised. We have Strikeforce Carnarvon in NSW, a Victoria Police investigation and a 4 year FWA investigation. No allegation against Jackson has withstood any degree of scrutiny. That’s probably because they are fictitious.

    It’s extraordinary that the persons that have brought this corruption to light and exposed the seedy underbelly of the ALP, are being viciously attacked by the idiots who peruse this blog of fictitious stories.

    We all know the reasons don’t we, that is they should have kept quiet as they do in other unions (such as the TWU). Well they haven’t and good on them. And for this (or is it really the good of the party) they should be thrown out and vilified?

    The union movement needs more leaders like Jackson and for that matter Dean Mighell. They have moved into the 21st century. The the rest of the pathetically irrelevant excuse of a union movement, cling to the light on the hill and neglect their members by putting the ALP first.

    It was Thomson, Wlliamson and other NSW officials (aided and abetted by the NSW Right) who ripped off HSU members. Not Jackson as ridiculous propaganda suggests. She has blown the lid on the cess pool and all the power to her.


    I’ll wager a substantial amount that a Royal Commission will find nothing against Jackson, but plenty about senior ALP persons. So stop whining and go to bed you wankers.

    Posted by Jack Sparrow | May 27, 2012, 13:48
  328. Damn right she’s brought the Union into the 21st century!

    That’s what doubling her salary was about, yeah…?

    We can’t have a national secretary on a measly 20th century salary, can we?

    You’re right in that we do have a police strike force, a 4 year investigation by FWA. yet no charges laid and all roads lead to Kooky Kaffy, who didn’t “blow da whistle” until the cops were already investigating. She isn’t a whistleblower, she’s just a manipulative arse coverer.

    Nice try, spinner :)

    Posted by Mug Punter | May 27, 2012, 14:32
  329. Jack Sparrow: FYI – VicPol now have the documents pertaining to Ms Jackson.

    Posted by Anon | May 27, 2012, 15:52
  330. Not Mighell | May 26, 2012, 12:49 Your Mighell, just show the accounts to your accusers if your so innocent and end the speculation, I bet you dont

    Posted by Your not welcome to Pat's funeral | May 27, 2012, 16:45
  331. Thommo is a bad actor and a poor liar.

    Posted by Anon | May 27, 2012, 21:46
  332. @ Your not welcome to Pat’s funeral | May 27, 2012, 16:45

    Thanks for outing yourself, yes that’s all it is in your very own words “speculation”, a fishing expedition where you all hope against hope that you will find something, anything at all that you can make something of. Trying on the time tested ploy of slandering everywhere and to anyone who will listen, you will always find someone willing to believe. This crap has been doing the rounds for years generated by grubs with an axe to grind. Like I said I am not Mighell and like many I don’t particularly like the bloke but that does not mean that I (and others) believe all this shit either. The ALP hacks sliming this about should take a lesson from Gillards book in regards to Thomson ‘innocent until proven guilty’ in a real court not in this court of self interest being conducted by a bunch of hacks. I have no doubt you will keep in peddling this whenever it suits you. Good luck in July, I strongly suspect it will all come to nought.

    Posted by Not Mighell | May 27, 2012, 22:10
  333. This will get you talking.

    With the way Club Fed is behaving are you sure you want a Republic now, with these people leading the country

    Posted by Mother | May 27, 2012, 22:10
  334. @ Your not welcome to Pat’s funeral | May 27, 2012, 16:45

    Thanks for outing yourself, yes that’s all it is in your very own words “speculation”, a fishing expedition where you all hope against hope that you will find something, anything at all that you can make something of. Trying on the time tested ploy of slandering everywhere and to anyone who will listen, you will always find someone willing to believe. This crap has been doing the rounds for years generated by grubs with an axe to grind. Like I said I am not Mighell and like many I don’t particularly like the bloke but that does not mean that I (and others) believe all this shit either. The ALP hacks sliming this about should take a lesson from Gillards book in regards to Thomson ‘innocent until proven guilty’ in a real court not in this court of self interest being conducted by a bunch of hacks. I have no doubt you will keep on peddling this whenever it suits you. Good luck in July, I strongly suspect it will all come to nought.

    Posted by Not Mighell | May 27, 2012, 22:11
  335. Jack sparrow, you are the right wing version of what you are accusing others here of, except that most here have an open mind to whats really happening, you on the other hand believe blindly what the lying libs and the mainstream media tell you which proves that you have the mental and emotional capacity of a railway sleeper which puts you on a par with T Abbot, C Pyne and J Bishop, and also probably explains why you believe every word that they utter.
    Sad really!

    Posted by Truth Seeker | May 27, 2012, 22:21
  336. Truth Seeker:
    Thank you, I have opinions about the people involved, alleged accusations, cross allegations and the multiple investigations that are underway.
    There are some new investigations about allegations that have been made.
    Can we please leave this with courts and police.
    I am sure some will fall and some will stand and the outcome will be quite revealing.

    Posted by Pick Pocket | May 27, 2012, 23:50
  337. Pick Pocket, you are welcome, and if you have not already checked out the articles by Peter Wicks on the whole sordid mess, I think you might find them interesting and enlightening.
    You are right of course, this should all be handled by the relevant authorities, and all have the right of the presumption of innocence.
    Unfortunately the mainstream media are only telling one side of the story, making it difficult for truth to prevail, but despite this I believe that it will!

    Posted by Truth Seeker | May 28, 2012, 0:14
  338. ***being viciously attacked by the idiots who peruse this blog of fictitious stories***

    Don’t make your judgement of Vex based on the Thomson coverage. It will pass, and sanity will return to blogging. In the meantime, read study and learn, to discover how ALP tribal loyalties trump not just politics, but basic morality.

    Posted by Byron in Wahroonga | May 28, 2012, 2:13
  339. I have just read all of Peter Wicks articles in Independant Australia and am apalled that we have been “conned” by the MSM.

    Kathy became a “whistleblower” after the fact , and has been running a campaign of obfuscation & lies fanned & supported by the LNP’s bloodlust to win power at all costs.

    Journalists in MSM have been happy to play along because of the political theatre , but if you scratch the surface an ugly truth emerges of large scale missapropriation and a lack of due dilligance on the part of the opposition of the accuser.

    Like leaving dracula in charge of the bloodbank , expect the HSu to be bled to death by the double dipping , and complete mismanagement pre -Thomson.In fact Thomson is just a red herring ,to distract the punters & MSM.

    Independant Australia has uncovered the real cesspit , it’s players and the elaborate game of deception .A must read.

    Posted by anonymous | May 28, 2012, 8:00
  340. I believe at this stage the material has also been passed onto the police.

    Posted by Pick Pocket | May 28, 2012, 9:12
  341. Remember this – perhaps she just forgot, or maybe it is a smear campaign against her. I am sure she will come up with something!

    Union dues, The Weekend Australian Magazine: February 18, 2012

    Jackson maintains that despite her combative past, she has never misappropriated union funds and that she is genuinely outraged by what she has discovered about her fellow union officials since being appointed as the HSU’s first female national secretary – succeeding Craig Thomson – in 2008.

    Posted by Anon | May 28, 2012, 9:39
  342. Going to be hard to argue against multiple company invoices and childacre receipts signed off by the whistleblower herself??

    Then again she’s getting free pro-bono from right wingers, they’ve go to keep the “whistleblower” performance alive, complete with brothel accusations (something not new in the HSU) and a sham FWA report that Abbott now waves in the air like gospel when he canned it not long ago .

    Looking forward to her next ABC 7.30 chat hopefully with replays of her blinking lies from previous interviews.

    Posted by anonymous | May 28, 2012, 10:04
  343. Thanks for Your reply dean.so you strongly suspect the federal court will come to nought.the multiple actions in NSW were lodged by quarter mile, not by yourself dean.that unfortunately has nothing to do with the VICTORIAN ETU BOOKS. you where asked to show the books, you then took out injunctions to stop the national office looking at the books.this is not ‘fishing,speculation when it come to millions of members money spent on legal fees to look at the COOKED BOOKS DEAN.
    filing date 28th march 2012
    filed 15th may 2012
    respondent DEAN MIGHELL JUNE 21st
    applicant file 27th july
    back in court for direction 9.30am
    tuesday july 31st 2012.
    now DEAN I DON’T CALL SPENDING ALL THIS TIME IN COURT SPECULATION.if you had opened the books when you were asked this could have been all avoided.time to step down and resign there will be no gardening at PROTECT for you.you have stolen enough from PROTECT.

    Posted by jimmy | May 28, 2012, 11:33
  344. Not Mighell | May 27, 2012, 22:11 Your Mighell, Long winded response (twice) to not take up the bet that you won’t show the accounts to an independent audit in line with your union’s directive and save the members money on Lawyers. You’re Mighell and you’re guilty

    Posted by You're not welcome at Pats Funeral | May 28, 2012, 12:19
  345. I say chaps … steady on.
    As much as I enjoy a good old de-marcation scrap, this is becoming most unedifying, even for a rolled gold Tory.
    Put all the dollies back in the pram and play nicely.

    Posted by Boris Johnson | May 28, 2012, 14:22
  346. just saw senator Abets telling the MSM that the senate estimates enquiry was just told that CT had misled parliament because the witness could not recall hearing the accusation from CT of him being set up using hookers,
    except that he did not say that she could not recall it, he just stated that this was proof that CT misled parliament. He then went on to say that FWA was Labors baby and that all the appointments were Labors.
    He, like all the LNP are quick to claim CT misled Parliament, but what about misleading the people senator?
    Is there no penalty for that?
    Are not the people that voted entitled to the truth?

    Posted by Truth Seeker | May 28, 2012, 14:42
  347. FAIR Work Australia has rejected claims made by Craig Thomson that one of its most senior officials had sought to influence the outcome of its investigation into the suspended Labor MP.

    Appearing before a Senate committee today, FWA president Iain Ross insisted he had not been provided “with any evidence to support the allegation” that Michael Lawler, the partner of Health Services Union whistleblower Kathy Jackson, had interfered in the long-running probe.

    Mr Ross, in a written statement to the parliament, also side-stepped allegations of “bias” levelled against the FWA by Mr Thomson during his hour-long statement to federal parliament last Monday.

    He said “any allegations of bias” can be tested in the Federal Court which will be asked to adjudicate on FWA’s findings that Mr Thomson is guilty of 156 separate contraventions of workplace laws during his time as HSU national secretary.

    Posted by Free Lawler | May 28, 2012, 14:45
  348. But even having resigned, Ms Glen is not free of the HSU. Ms Jackson’s partner, Fair Work Australia vice-president Michael Lawler, rang her to persuade her not to resign in a manner that she alleges was aggressive.

    According to a letter of complaint she sent to Fair Work Australia president Geoffrey Giudice, Mr Lawler told her that if she resigned, it would enable HSU East general-secretary Michael Williamson, one of Ms Jackson’s factional enemies, to place his preferred replacement in her job.

    “You can f . . k off and take sick leave if you don’t want to do the work and still be paid, but you can’t resign,” Mr Lawler allegedly told her.

    A few days after Mr Giudice approached Mr Lawler about Ms Glen’s complaint, Mr Lawler wrote to NSW Police making allegations of criminal conduct against her. In his letter to the head of Strikeforce Carnarvon, which is investigating alleged corruption in the HSU, Mr Lawler claims Ms Glen and HSU East acting assistant general-secretary Gerard Hayes may have engaged in a criminal conspiracy. Ms Glen and Mr Hayes strenuously deny Mr Lawler’s allegations.

    Mr Lawler claims Ms Glen may have been given an inducement to give false evidence, noting that in a private email exchange with her partner in December, she had referred to a cheque she was going to pick up.

    “I had ordered a bank cheque to pay my rent,” Ms Glen said, questioning how Mr Lawler had obtained her emails. She says she finds it extraordinary that Mr Lawler, the second highest industrial judge in the land, would engage in such a campaign.

    the australian

    Posted by pure as the driven snow | May 28, 2012, 15:14
  349. I’m as guilty as sin but I still think I can talk my way out of it.

    Posted by Craig the Unstable of Dobell | May 28, 2012, 15:53
  350. Stop talking about it or the Member for Dobell gets it!!!

    Posted by Craig the Unstable of Dobell | May 28, 2012, 15:54
  351. I saw Sen’ Abetz(aka; Pastor Lovejoy)trying to “lead the witness” to deny that C.Thomson had informed them at all, but was corrected and told he did inform that there were “some people” out to get him, but he did not mention the “hookers”till later.
    Abetz is better with used car salesmen!….he loves being “taken for a ride” in a ute!!

    Posted by joe | May 28, 2012, 18:09
  352. Jimmy. You have a few good points but as usual you go too far. The hate takes over. Be very carefull my friend as you do not want to bite off the hand that is currently feeding you!

    Posted by You Go Too Far | May 28, 2012, 20:28
  353. Hastie group has gone down due to financial problems which are part of the CEPU. the question has been asked where’s DEAN MIGHELL he has in the past always been keen for TV coverage or for a photo shoot but no where to be seen.i believe he was busy clearing out his office.

    Posted by jimmy | May 28, 2012, 20:32
  354. what does DEAN MIGHELL,MATTHEW NEWTON AND GRANT HACKETT all have in common, they are all sick.

    Posted by jimmy | May 28, 2012, 20:35
  355. Jackson the ‘whistleblower’ not only has brought down HSU, but also the FWA and now its Vice President.

    Posted by Anon | May 28, 2012, 20:50
  356. Mrs T just found out I took cash from Mark Riley to let Riles perve on Mrs T in the shower.
    That is why I was sooking about it.
    I am in deep shit.

    Posted by Pants on Fire of Dobell | May 28, 2012, 20:59
  357. Just watched the Pres of the FWA on the 7.30 cautiously distance himself from the VP Michael Lawler and his involvement in the HSU debacle and wiggle out of answering any question on the “transparency” of it’s process and “meddling” .

    Posted by Anon | May 28, 2012, 21:12
  358. It is quite clear that the Pres could not guarantee the transparency of the FWA. His huffing and puffing about having his hands tied smacks of self preservation.

    How can it’s report be perceived as fair and unprejudiced now? when it appears it has Lawlers fingerprints all over it?

    The interview revealed much in what it didn’t reveal , dysfunction and denials and interference.

    Posted by Anonymous | May 28, 2012, 21:50
  359. Never ever ever elect a wowed PM ever again

    Posted by Mole | May 28, 2012, 22:16
  360. The Pres of FWA should be called back to the Senate and explain why he lied to the committee about Lawler. A letter by Lawler sent to Strike Force Carnarvon with copies of HSU minutes provided by his partner IS evidence of interference in an investigation of the HSU.

    Posted by Sue | May 28, 2012, 23:13
  361. Maybe Lawler should be called to the priveleges Committee as well. What ever happend to the complaint made by Carol about Lawler’s meddling ?? Sounds like a kangaroo court to me

    Posted by Anonymous | May 28, 2012, 23:25
  362. And Lawler was supposedly unavailable to be at the Senate committee today, as he is on Long Leave, but he was able to give a comment to 7.30. Maybe Erica Betz should call for Lawler to come on in and have a chat

    Posted by Sue | May 28, 2012, 23:32
  363. Lawler took long leave after it was revealed by K J that he was in bed, both literally and figuratively, with the so called whistle blower, and the obvious conflict of interest.
    He probably realised the conflict while she was busy blowing “the whistle’. The question is Whose whistle.

    Posted by Truth Seeker | May 28, 2012, 23:48
  364. Jack Sparrow: FYI – VicPol now have the documents pertaining to Ms Jackson.

    Posted by Anon | May 27, 2012, 15:52

    That’s old new dear chap. If you talk to journos, they’ll tell you that a few days after receiving those documents, VicPol wrote to Jackson advising her that she was NOT under investigation. Hence the press have not run it. Get you facts straight you wayward conspiracy theorist.

    Posted by Jack Sparrow | May 28, 2012, 23:51
  365. Jack sparrow, you are the right wing version of what you are accusing others here of, except that most here have an open mind to whats really happening, you on the other hand believe blindly what the lying libs and the mainstream media tell you which proves that you have the mental and emotional capacity of a railway sleeper which puts you on a par with T Abbot, C Pyne and J Bishop, and also probably explains why you believe every word that they utter.
    Sad really!

    Posted by Truth Seeker | May 27, 2012, 22:21

    Sadly truth seeker, those who seek the truth without knowing what it is, will find illusions. What you call open mindedness is actually opening your mind to folly. I suppose I could be open minded and convince myself that I’ve been anally probed by little grey men.

    Posted by Anonymous | May 28, 2012, 23:54
  366. Oh my, isn’t he the very model of independent journalism, just another anti Jackson ALP conspiracy, you wankers.

    Peter Wicks is ALP’s candidate for Hawkesbury


    30 Dec 10 @ 06:43pm by Lawrence Machado

    LABOR’S candidate for Hawkesbury, Peter Wicks, is not buying into the argument that the governing party is dead and buried come next year’s State elections.

    A newcomer into the political hurly burly, he says Labor can win the 2011 elections by highlighting the positives while exposing the lack of policies by the Liberals

    “Nothing is impossible and I am confident of winning because Labor has a good story to sell in NSW,” Mr Wicks, of Kellyville, told the Times.

    “Basically I am sick of inaction and we have a bunch of politicians who take their constituents for granted.

    “This is a strong Liberal area and their politicians think they don’t have to work for their seats.

    “Though I am new to politics, I have been a keen observer of politics for some time.”

    Mr Wicks, who turned 43 yesterday said the Liberals are reluctant to talk up their policies, making the voters wary.

    “Labor has a real policy and we have many positives to talk about, unlike the Liberals who are unwilling to talk of their policies or don’t have any,” Mr Wicks said.

    “One of the main reasons I am contesting is because I am very concerned about the Liberals’ standing on social issues such as disability.

    “In fact, the Labor Govt has committed to $2 billion in disability funding.”

    A successful businessman, Mr Wicks is confident the recent resignations and clean out of several Labor MPs is the best thing to happen to the party.

    “It’s a changing of the guard basically and it does make the party younger and vibrant,” he said.

    Mr Wicks, who is married with one child, grew up in Carlingford and lived in West Pennant Hills before moving to Kellyville.He can be contacted on peterwicks.alp@gmail.com or Twitter @pwicksalp

    Posted by Jack Sparrow | May 29, 2012, 0:02
  367. Tonight’s I watched the funniest ABC Q&A ever. Satirist Barry Humphries AO CBE called Craig Thomson a lair, and a few other things, and writer David Maher gave Thompson a big serve too. There you have it; end of story.

    It was also suggested that Dame Edna Everage should relocate from Moonee Ponds and be parachuted into Dobell as the new MHR.

    Posted by Adrian Jackson | May 29, 2012, 0:03
  368. If Thomson is telling the truth and someone else “set him up with a bunch of hookers” why didn’t he report this to police YEARS AGO when the whore bill appeared on his credit card statement????? Don’t tell me he didn’t check…

    Posted by Dobell village idiot | May 29, 2012, 0:12
  369. Sadly Anonymous, you do seem to have some trouble with making up your mind, if in fact this version of you you has one, but you also you don’t seem to understand the fundamentals of SEEKING the truth.
    Seeking is NOT knowing, but being prepared to acknowledge the truth when you find it.
    The other problem that you seem to have is that you can’t tell the difference between your mind and your arse, although from some of your comments it becomes increasingly obvious that they are interchangeable.
    Very sad!

    Posted by Truth Seeker | May 29, 2012, 0:23
  370. I don’t like the word “hooker” its so American. Call them whores (not ho’s either), tarts, strumpets, and trollops.

    Posted by Adrian Jackson | May 29, 2012, 1:03
  371. Jack Sparrow FYI: Vic Pol got new documents last Wednesday

    Posted by Anon | May 29, 2012, 7:07
  372. So HSU officials put in a complaint to FWA that Lawwler was phoning them and involving himself in HSU business. So who ends up with the complaint on his desk, Lawler. Now the HSU officials hear nothing about their complaint from FWA, while private citizen, FWA deputy president writes to Strike Force Carnarvon.

    Posted by Sue | May 29, 2012, 7:57
  373. The President of the FWA failed to address what happend to the complaint lodged by Carol Glen about Lawlers interference in HSU matters and his call pleading her not to step down.Where did that complaint go? And why did it not get dealt with? How fair is Fair work Australia? How independant are its officers? How many lines were crossed? Why are both Nassios and Lawler on leave?

    Posted by Truth seeker | May 29, 2012, 9:08
  374. @ Sue – FWA is in two divisions, the administrative arm led by the General Manager, and the workplace relations arm, led by Iain Ross.

    Iain Ross, nor for that matter Michael Lawler, have any power over the General Manager.

    Its called natural justice to provide a copy of a complaint to the accused.

    The President of FWA (then Guidice) knew of Lawler’s relationship with KJ from the beginning, when Jeff emailed him expressing his unhappiness at sharing his wife with the VP in charge of the health panel!

    Having said that – Lawler is a nice bloke…..

    Posted by Armed against the Enemy | May 29, 2012, 9:15
  375. What happens when the lawyers providing Jackson with tens of thousands of dollars free legal representation turn up before her partner in court against a party which hasn’t provided her with pro bono advice? Apprehension of bias? Messy indeed.

    Posted by Pro bono | May 29, 2012, 9:58
  376. “Having said that – Lawler is a nice bloke…..”
    Based on………

    Posted by Sue | May 29, 2012, 11:34
  377. Dean Mighell is a hero because hundreds of Hastie electricians have lost their jobs and haven’t got access to their redundancies even though their redundancy money is in a fund that Dean Mighell is the chair of and has the deciding vote

    Posted by ??????? | May 29, 2012, 13:12
  378. “Boo Hoo I feel sorry for you blokes losing your job, sorry mate can you move to the left a bit so Channel ten can get a clear shot of me mate?, OK? Boo hoo and having to tell you’re kids you’ve lost you’re jobs, Hang on a second, Howard can you get the Herald Sun Photographer something to stand on, I look less fat from above, OK? Boo Hoo Waaaaa, By the way None of you guys care if the media in this meeting while you’re getting sacked do you? Waaaa Waaa”

    Posted by Guess Who ? | May 29, 2012, 14:05
  379. I’m going to take a few with me.
    We will ultimately win this battle you pricks.
    I will be ezzonurated of all these scurilus accusations.
    We’ll get youse!!!

    Oh wait … Tony’s been elected with a monster majority.
    Shit!! Royal Commission into Union corruption.
    Double Shit!!! Terms of reference include “Should Private Providers be able to compete with Unions for Advocacy work”

    Look out … the gravy train is going off the rails.

    Posted by Craig the Unstable of Dobell | May 29, 2012, 14:12
  380. When can you start Craig?

    Posted by Jim of Jim's Mowing | May 29, 2012, 14:13
  381. Bruce Morton Wilson had sex with Julia Gillard and conspired with her (whilst she was legal council at Slater & Gordon in stealing >1m from the AWU/employers in a fraud scheme. Julia set up the instruments for the deception and is alleged to be fully aware of the purpose to defraud. (stat dec to this) Julia allegedly received large sums as her ‘share’. The stat dec is from Bob H, Vp vict AWU on record, as well as other evidence on record including hansard. Gillard admits the allegation claiming she was ‘young & naive’ at the time. Well she was 33 and the legal counsel for the AWU… Another early indicator we had of her appalling lack of judgment or integrity.
    She was separated from Slater & Gordon intending to ‘pay the money back’. Conroy and Shorten smoothed it all over for her (with subsequent far reaching consequences in these 2 now having key positions in Govt) and Gillard was hidden in Brumbies office, rehabilited, and then given a safe seat as payoff.
    In all – Gillards entry into the political stage has an amazing parallel to Craig Thomson. A corrupted nepotistic union/affiliate with form in stealing, grafting and lying their way into power.

    Posted by Carol | May 29, 2012, 16:52
  382. THANKS DEAN.ALL ABOUT YOU.TIME TO GO!!!.time to sell one of your eight houses to help pay the members morgage’s, as they are unable to help themself’s to a safe like yourself. the working class hero!!!see you on the front of the HERALD SUN MID AUGUST……

    Posted by jimmy | May 29, 2012, 18:15
  383. wothers – Why would Barry Humphries want to say anything good about unions, he grew up in Camberwell. He called Craig Thompson a “ratbag” on Q&A too.

    Posted by Adrian Jackson | May 29, 2012, 18:44
  384. Kathy is a pinup doll. My first & continuing impression of Kathy Jackson is that she is hot. Intelligent, articulate, purposeful, with courage and purpose, and the way she moves. She is like a lithe tawny lioness of a woman, a flowing mane, slender limbs, a beautiful face, she is really attractive. And smart. I want a woman like that. Sip I asked the other guys around work and they said the same. Kathy is rated as really hot !
    She represents femininty, grace, intelligence and beauty. We all love you Kathy, the real working men of Australia think you’re fantastic.

    Posted by Tom & the rest of us | May 29, 2012, 20:40
  385. Tom & the rest of us, you must be ‘drowning in a sea of delusion’. Or are you Michael, Jeff or Bolano? I know Jackson and she is rotten in and out!

    Posted by Anon | May 29, 2012, 21:10
  386. To all the idiot Mighell Haters now trying to slander him over the collapse of Hastie. The Protect Trust Deed like any trust deed requires that an employee needs to fulfil certain criteria in order to claim on the fund. The administrators of the collapsed company did not make the workers redundant they kep them on the books but not getting paid; a common ploy by receivers/companies to keep the work and profits ticking over for the shareholders but a terrible situation for workers who are in a limbo. It is designed to force them to resign if they do they lose redundancy entitlements and this is a financial plus for the receiver and the company it reduces liability. In negototiating a redundancy these workers now have certainty, they might not have jobs but they are no longer economic hostages of Hastie. This is a pretty good outcome for ETU members and a good move by the union. It is the only way they could legally access their entitlements you morons. I am sure if the ETU had have breached the Trust Deed you would have been baying for blood over that as well. You are all f*cking idiots and the dregs of the union movement.

    Posted by Anonymous | May 30, 2012, 0:50
  387. Ok, well we only get to see her on TV – but to the wider public ( people like us on the floor) she comes across as good looking, intelligent, articulate and in touch.
    She is someone who stood up for the members, has guts, and isn’t a fat old back office hack, or a pock marked little creep spiv in a ill fitting suit spending the money on hookers.
    With Kathy, you can pin that up in the wall, say that’s our girl. Sure she may cost a bomb to run, but its money well spent.
    When it came down to it – she had guts, courage and style.
    Kathy, from all of us at #3 fab plant – your our idol !

    Posted by Tom & the rest of us | May 30, 2012, 2:28
  388. Tom & the rest of us

    Check this article at Independent Australia and see what she really does with members funds:

    Thomson 6: Kathy Jackson and the HSU $½ million

    Posted by Anon | May 30, 2012, 10:55
  389. Hahahahahahahha

    Prissy Christopher (I didn’t send those emails) Pyne lifts his skirt an attempts to flee.

    Mr Thomson voted with the Coalition, prompting manage of Opposition business Christopher Pyne to try to leave the chamber to cancel out Mr Thomson’s “tainted” vote.

    As Mr Pyne raced for the exit, Deputy Speaker Anna Burke ruled that it was too late for him to leave.

    Posted by Michelle | May 30, 2012, 11:42
  390. Anonymous | May 30, 2012, 0:50 It is the only way they could legally access their entitlements? Please, you forgot to include in your rant there would no doubt be a hardship provision incorporated in the trust which Mighell (you) could trigger with His (your) deciding vote for these type of circumstances as well as huge amount of funds put aside for business class around the World airfares for the Chair.

    Posted by The Annual Leave fund | May 30, 2012, 13:16
  391. It has been very interesting reading everything on this…but from at least one outsider’s P.O.V., it’s a right-royal cockup.

    Essentially this stuff Kathy’s doing smacks of the sort of right-wing tom-foolery Zora Marko would have done if she had not lost the support of practically the whole No.1 Victoria branch executive in the 2002 union elections.

    In the end…as I do know Ms. Marko’s politics…having been married to her in the early-eighties…it’s farcical to hear people bagging unions for being left-wing when right-wingers are being the most divisive.

    What happens when you get Liberal-voting right-wing officials in unions like the HSU?

    They help the Libs. Not the members.

    That said by someone who’s politically-CENTRIST after his marital experience with the aforementioned Ms. Marko.

    Posted by George | May 30, 2012, 14:08
  392. I remember an eighties board game called “Poleconomy.”

    Back in the days of revalued or devalued Aussie dollars.

    The only way to win it was to be a corrupt prime minister who gave good deals to the businesses and owned a few in the game.

    Zora was actually quite good at that game when she and I used to play it and won time and again playing those tactics.

    Bit of an indicator of her later political career.

    Even my younger brother knew she voted Libs.

    Posted by George | May 30, 2012, 14:21
  393. Thanks dean…the mighell haters out there and there’s plenty.they must understand with the protect scheme we have a hardship clause.with dean’s reluctance to use this.as in the past dean has had levy money collected on jobs EG RCH, the money is then counted and stored in DEANS PERSONAL SAFE.. he then rights out cheque’s through the distress and mortality fund.the cash money is then laundered through dean’s safe and spent as he please’s, he has this procedure down PAT.

    Posted by jimmy | May 30, 2012, 18:18
  394. Cheap media stunt. There’s two-card Thommo skulking into the House via a door on the Opposition side just as the vote is called, media having been tipped off beforehand.

    Posted by Jim | May 30, 2012, 19:06
  395. The problem with Human beings, is that we tend to judge others according to our own standards or lack thereof, and those that make judgements based on lies and misinformation about claims that have not been proven or even properly tested, condemn, not the accused but THEMSELVES as ignorant, stupid and irrelevant.

    Posted by Truth Seeker | May 31, 2012, 0:03
  396. up early again DEAN.time to go!!!the working class thief and liar.

    Posted by jimmy | May 31, 2012, 5:49
  397. This morning, I watched the reaction of two of the right wing media hacks (and I mean hacks in the most detrimental sense of the word) jump up on their high horses of righteous indignation because CT had the temerity to laugh at the puerile antics of tony Rabbot and Christopher Pain trying to run from parliament.
    Those well known media icons Karl Stuckwithnodick and Biteyer Buttrose, who have taken great delight in declaring CT guilty at every opportunity, showed their collective hands by instead of roasting the ‘one who would be king’ for his childish reaction, they blamed CT for acting as an independent, which he is as a result of the right wing harassment.
    Biteyer getting particularly hot under the collar because he (CT) had a smile on his face.
    Now CT showing his support for defeating the gag motion was, I believe, his way of standing up to the bully boys ( and girls), and saying that he was not frightened by anything that the LNP has to say, and after years of accusations, lies, half truths and innuendo, against him I think he has the right to crack a smile when he has the rare opportunity to show the LNP for the idiots that really they are, and the puerile pantomime that the parliament has become, as a result of the win at any cost and born to rule mentality of the opposition!

    Posted by Amused | May 31, 2012, 11:35
  398. May as well have a bit of fun while I can.
    I’ll be working for Jim’s Mowing next year.

    Posted by Stand-back-or-I'll-top-meself of Dobell | May 31, 2012, 14:16
  399. Does anyone know where the interest goes on the $millions put away for Esso Offshore workers redundancy fund?
    I’m told the ETU are managing it.

    Posted by Sad and Lonely of Bass Strait | May 31, 2012, 14:18
  400. large amounts of money,ETU and DEAN MIGHELL is not good.will look in to this one and report back.

    Posted by jimmy | May 31, 2012, 18:08
  401. Stand -back-or-i’ll-top-meself of Dobell, is that you Tony? if so you’re too l;ate, as I have already applied for the job!

    Posted by Chris payne | May 31, 2012, 18:29
  402. how to ask rob

    Posted by freddy | May 31, 2012, 18:42
  403. waiting for the clean up thanks minister

    Posted by freddy | May 31, 2012, 18:43
  404. looking for new job as treasurer hsu, u also

    Posted by freddy | May 31, 2012, 18:47
  405. To find out how Jackson spends members money check out this at Independent Australia:

    Thomson 8: The HSU family

    Posted by Watch this space | June 1, 2012, 22:06
  406. I was wrong. I didn’t think there was anyone in the labour party who could organise a root in a brothel.

    Posted by Glen Ulmarra | June 2, 2012, 19:09
  407. Glen.
    I didn’t really organise any roots in a brothel.
    I just paid the ladies and they did all the organising.
    Even though I paid for having a root I think they really liked me.

    Posted by Craig with Faux Depression of Dobell | June 3, 2012, 17:57


January 2019
« Jul