// you’re viewing...

Labor

BIMBO ERUPTION: Michelle Chantelois to accuse Mike Rann of having sex in Premier’s office

mikerannbimbo SA Premier Mike Rann faces a political nightmare on Sunday evening with Michelle Chantelois, a former waitress at State Parliament House, to accuse of him having sexual relations with him, including in his Premier’s office.

Ms Chantelois’s former husband allegedly physically attacked Rann at an ALP function earlier this year. He is due to appear in court next month. Chantelois has moved on and is believed to be in a relationship with another man, which some suspect is what provoked the angry ex.

Channel Seven has already begun heavily promoting the programme Sunday Night in what is sure to be a ratings blockbuster. It is not common for Australian current affairs programmes to pay large sums for sensational stories and this certainly qualifies. Those familiar with these things tell VEXNEWS it would not be out of the question for her to receive $200,000 for a story of this nature.

Just weeks ago, the scorned woman’s lawyers were writing to journalists asking them to respect her privacy.

While this is a tricky and unpleasant situation for the Premier, Wikipedia indicates that he was divorced from his first wife in the late 1990s and didn’t remarry until mid 2006. The friendship between Ms Chantelois and the Premier seems to have occurred prior to that although after he met his current wife.

The Premier’s wife Sasha Carruozzo is believed to be familiar with the story and has loudly publicly defended him. We suspect if that continues, Rann will survive the unpleasant incident.

But with an election just around the corner this is not what Premier Mike Rann needs.

Discussion

83 comments for “BIMBO ERUPTION: Michelle Chantelois to accuse Mike Rann of having sex in Premier’s office”

  1. get theo to give him a call

    Posted by Anonymous | November 20, 2009, 21:49
  2. Unfounded accusations are enough. Nevermind facts – just go with the finger of accusation.

    Posted by Anonymous | November 20, 2009, 21:58
  3. It’s showtime!

    Posted by King_of_Ennui | November 20, 2009, 22:15
  4. Sasha was already his partner when he came to office in 2002.

    Posted by Peter B | November 20, 2009, 22:37
  5. Michelle chantelois.. Does she work at salisbury high?

    Posted by Anonymus | November 20, 2009, 23:10
  6. RANNDY!

    Posted by Anonymous | November 20, 2009, 23:16
  7. Is she single?

    Posted by Billy Bob Shorten | November 20, 2009, 23:25
  8. She only served me light refreshments.

    Posted by Rann Dee | November 21, 2009, 1:53
  9. With Fran sleeping amd others porking how much work is done by some of our pollies.Next you will be telling me Penny W likes girls.

    Posted by Citizen | November 21, 2009, 9:13
  10. Michelle, I’m in Adelaide next wk. Will need a lift home. Txt me pls. Wld b very hot

    Posted by RDR | November 21, 2009, 9:52
  11. The Adelaide Now and Advertiser journalist, Greg Kelton has been a constant spokeman for Rann throughout this saga.

    Not a report passes without the same old line – that the current ‘missus’ knows all about it, and is quite happy! Code for “if she is OK, the rest of you should not worry”.

    I think he’ll find the readers are not fools and they are onto him.

    Posted by Donald of SA | November 21, 2009, 10:15
  12. Well if della can do it, so can ranny.
    It has become a bit of sport these days

    Posted by Bambi | November 21, 2009, 11:24
  13. I don’t find Michelle attractive.

    Posted by Pissy Cryne | November 21, 2009, 12:01
  14. goodbye randy rann you wont be missed

    Posted by greg wright | November 21, 2009, 12:37
  15. I can see a headline here.
    WAITRESS: I WAS RUDDED BY RANN.

    Posted by Gregoryno6 | November 21, 2009, 12:50
  16. Citizen,who is this Penny W,to whom you refer,who may or may not like girls? More information please.

    Posted by Anonymous | November 21, 2009, 13:10
  17. I’m dedicating this one to Ranny.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P3ZdheRKzMk

    Posted by Otis Redding's Ghost | November 21, 2009, 13:23
  18. Where I seduced singers and movie stars, Ranny bangs barmaids and waitresses.

    What a working-class Man of the People he is….a Labor hero, no less.

    Posted by John Fitzgerald Kennedy | November 21, 2009, 13:28
  19. OMG, another slapper .
    is she shaved

    Posted by Bob | November 21, 2009, 13:37
  20. This white trash would fit in so well in the middle school belt.

    Posted by Jane | November 21, 2009, 13:38
  21. i met mike rann and sasha at a radio interview in 2004. they were very much together then, she told me herself. he is trying to spin this as much as possible… he is guilty and has abused the priviledge of public office. just what labour need with only 3 days sitting left !! go libs, restore the balance in parliament.

    Posted by dan | November 21, 2009, 14:22
  22. *groan* more puritanical bullsh*t.

    Who cares who shags who? It’s a free country, isn’t it?

    Posted by Close to the storm | November 21, 2009, 15:28
  23. Why is Rann waiting until Monday to respond? If he was an upfront and honest man; anyone with integrity would be able to make a statement before it went to air? He obviously doesn’t want to incriminate himself more than he has to! weak weak weak, not someone we should have attempting to run the State!

    Posted by Why wait til Monday? | November 21, 2009, 17:05
  24. Michelle Chantelois was paid to do an interview by a commercial channel. Never believe anyone who is paid to make such allegations. And really what do we care if she did have sex with the premier. Does it affect her ability to do her job?

    Posted by iReckon | November 21, 2009, 17:18
  25. Why didn’t he just pay her to keep it quiet, that’s what i taught little Ian to do if he gets in the bog!

    Posted by Stan the Man | November 21, 2009, 17:19
  26. Money talks. Pay me $200,000 and I’ll say I had sex with Rann!

    Posted by $$$ | November 21, 2009, 17:39
  27. I was just exercising a little parliamentary privilege.

    Posted by Mike the Bike | November 21, 2009, 17:55
  28. As I often said to my friend Michelle “This is going to be massive, just massive”

    Posted by Rann Dee | November 21, 2009, 18:00
  29. When Penny is not checking the weather [climate] she may like to look up Michelle.Its a modern world girls can do what ever they like.

    Posted by Citizen | November 21, 2009, 18:14
  30. Sex with Mike Rann . . . . hmmm. . .

    Posted by Pissy Chryne | November 21, 2009, 19:16
  31. i heard from Lance that a CIGAR was mentioned-RANN=TWIT

    Posted by blackpointer | November 21, 2009, 19:37
  32. Mikey I don’t kiss and tell and I wear a frock better.

    Posted by Pissy Chryne | November 21, 2009, 21:56
  33. How unprofessional of Mike Rann. He should focus entirely on work and forget about these sort of extra- curricular activities.

    Posted by Greg Combet | November 21, 2009, 22:37
  34. Bill is right. And I agree with him

    Posted by Greg Combet | November 21, 2009, 22:39
  35. Rann me…

    Posted by C.Lang-dun(MP for now) | November 22, 2009, 1:36
  36. Cigars, stains on dress….

    Posted by No Pokies | November 22, 2009, 2:23
  37. Are you a professional journalist? You write very well.

    Posted by Bunker | November 22, 2009, 8:59
  38. Well Greg I don’t need you to tell me to focus on work. What ever else she may say I think my friend Michelle will confirm I was always on the job.

    Posted by Rann Dee | November 22, 2009, 11:13
  39. Now offering escorted tour of North Adelaide’s premier golf course. Chance to play away. Txt me, price neg from $200k.

    Posted by michelle the gel | November 22, 2009, 11:51
  40. Hi Michelle, Does the golf tour start at the back 9? Will Mike “the Wood” Rann be in attendance?

    Posted by Pissy Cryne | November 22, 2009, 11:56
  41. Wasn’t a former SA Liberal Premier involved with a 16 year old years ago before Labours Don Dunstan was Premier in SA? They covered that one up I understand. Adultery is tacky , if true in this case, but many married people are sexual degenerates who can’t make up their mind about their partners. I am glad I am single

    Posted by Adrian Jackson | November 22, 2009, 16:32
  42. Why do our Parliaments need a bar on the premise?

    Posted by Adrian Jackson | November 22, 2009, 16:36
  43. Why do our Parliament have so many “bars” on the premises

    Posted by Adrian Jackson | November 22, 2009, 17:15
  44. Channel 7 about to air Rann allegations – I guess no party hack is on this blog, all tuned to their TV in salivating anticipation !!!!!!!!

    Posted by Anonymous | November 22, 2009, 18:47
  45. Watched Ch.7. Let me get this right.

    1. A married woman lied and cheated on her husband with a single man.

    2. She gets paid $200 grand to tell her story.

    3. But its all his fault.

    Oh aint journalism grand.

    Posted by Anonymous | November 22, 2009, 20:07
  46. Serving the state with pride. Where is Kev & Pat now?

    Posted by No Pokies | November 22, 2009, 20:43
  47. This wouldn’t be a problem for Mr Rann had he not consistently adopted a high moral ground stance to the extent that his entire credibility as Premier is based PURELY on his moral fibre. Do I think sexual relations between consenting adults wrong? Absolutely not BUT I’m not the one who has belted the SA public over the head with a right-wing moral philosophy for the past 8 years … that’s the Premier’s dilemma … he successfully stepped to the right of the Liberals on law’n'order (a la Carr) and then skilfully linked law and order outrage to personal morality. The question now in the public’s mind is that as the self-appointed and outspoken arbiter and guardian of the state’s moral space has he walked the talk?

    Posted by Anon Too | November 22, 2009, 20:53
  48. What is it with people like Rann? He’s single and free to have relationships but goes for the seedy clandestine stuff he knows are off limits for a Premier. He’s denied it happened fanning intrigue yet the evidence must be there such as use of official and other vehicles, phone and the parliamentary visitors book. He acts like public office is his driving force when actually its his libido. He should be sacked for being an idiot.

    Posted by Cathy | November 22, 2009, 21:23
  49. no wonder its not a 50 zone down near the river

    Posted by blackpointer | November 22, 2009, 21:58
  50. What a load of garbage from a money hungry sleezy woman! Who cares if she had sex with Mike Rann, tell your story if you have to but dont lie about your motivation to do it. “Oh it’s not about the money, the money has nothing to do with it.. I did it because my husband deserves to know”. Does she think we are all stupid??? Like you would chose this form of media circus to finally come clean to your family and if you cared about your children you wouldnt be airing the affair in such a way. It was all about the dollars. I mean really the details in the interview as well?? They might as well have got into every sexual position that they had sex in. Totally disgusted in the behaviour of this woman to air this publically the way she has, just for the money.
    Also to imply that her contract were not renewed because of the fact she was working at a high school in Rann’s electorate??? I know they said no allegations there, like yeah right. Has she thought that maybe her main skills are more suited to her being a barmaid?? and doing tricks for tips??? Like driving and parking in the dark giving favours?? Her skills maybe dont lie in working in a professional environment..
    Very sleezy and tacky!!

    Posted by Disgusted | November 22, 2009, 22:00
  51. Get real Anon Too, Rann has never been a moral high ground type so he isn’t going to get done for a bit of self serve in the Parliamentary Dining Room. Still, can’t imagine the missus is too pleased, he might have to bunk down on the office couch for a bit.

    Posted by Dons Ghost | November 22, 2009, 22:07
  52. Yawn. Hands up who’s had norty sex. Ok, can we move onto something else?

    Posted by Fascine-ating | November 22, 2009, 22:17
  53. If its not about money, then she can give the $200 grand to charity.

    Posted by Anonymous | November 22, 2009, 22:34
  54. School contracts would finish at the end of the school year wouldn’t they ? Quite irrelevant whether sex was had or not. This woman’s reason for giving her $200K version is not believable. Another option could be that she received a knock-back from the Premier and felt a little miffed, or she had problems with a violent husband and confided in Rann. Not hard to concoct a story is it?

    Posted by Disbeliever | November 22, 2009, 22:53
  55. mike rammed her haha

    Posted by Anonymous | November 22, 2009, 22:55
  56. In “It’s Grossly Improper” John Ceruto made a similar claim about the cold and heartless way Don Dunstan brought their own affair to an end.

    Posted by knut | November 22, 2009, 23:00
  57. Yes you are right disbeliever, school contracts do finish at the end of the school year. The reasons they dont get renewed could be one of many, the position has ended or the school no longer can fund the position. School budgets are largely based on student numbers and if there is a drop funding extra admin staff is extremely difficult.
    Also I agree, it has crossed my mind that she may have been a woman who was scorned and now wants to get something from it.
    No one will know what is really going on I suppose and over all this media circus no one ever will.

    Posted by Disgusted | November 22, 2009, 23:00
  58. mmm methinks that there are a few personality disordered people operating out there. The I nned my husband to know the truth on top of everything else DV???

    Posted by MUNDANE DRAMA | November 22, 2009, 23:37
  59. Spot on, Anon Too. Yet I choose to use another tack: Rann has trashed the state’s legitimate judicial system, replacing it with media trials that have sometimes been cowardly staged on the floor of the Coward’s Castle. So it is a supreme irony that Rann has now been tried by his own Media Court creation, and quite predictably has been found wanting. Of course it is all very unfair to him; yet so was the Rann’s Media Court treatment of Tom Easling and the late John Mountford.

    Posted by knut | November 22, 2009, 23:38
  60. I agree with anon – if its not about the money, give it to charity!

    ‘Dan’ – how the hell is this ‘abusing parliamentary privilege’?

    And ‘Why wait till Monday’ – I would think the reason Rann was silent over all this before the allegations went to air is because it is obviously sensible to wait to see what the allegations are before responding to them!

    Both of you have totally illogical arguments and are clearly jealous because you’re not getting any!

    Posted by Stan | November 23, 2009, 8:07
  61. I love this shit. Forget about how unresponsive governments are and generally how their public servants under perform: it’s time to produce change.

    Posted by Non | November 23, 2009, 9:15
  62. I loved her story about her son finding out about it – he overheard her on the phone admitting the adultery to a friend.

    Classy.

    She then tells the story about how her son said he loved her and she is worried about her children blah, blah, blah … all the time sounding like she’s crying but the eyes are completely dry (and blank).

    I’ve got a question … if she was so worried about the impact this media attention was having on her children, why would she go on NATIONAL TELEVISION and ensure that all their SCHOOL FRIENDS will know about this as well?

    It’s just as well she got paid well for this, because the kids are going to need it for their therapy.

    Posted by glad I'm not her children | November 23, 2009, 9:37
  63. leave the poor gal alone ; Rann was only doing to her what all pollies do to their constituents; problem is he was filling his pen from the company ink well; thats abuse of position if he cant be trusted in the parliamentry bar and dining room……..where can he be trusted

    Posted by jazz | November 23, 2009, 9:37
  64. Let the media and Ms Chantelois talk of head jobs and hand jobs, Mike and his team will stay focused on real jobs for South Australians. LOL.

    Posted by Arther conan doyle | November 23, 2009, 10:07
  65. My issue is that he was doing this on the taxpayers’ time.

    He was fu*king her, and fu*king us at the same time!

    Posted by Visitant | November 23, 2009, 10:14
  66. Taxpayer’s time? What hours are they Visitant?

    Posted by Arther conan doyle | November 23, 2009, 10:35
  67. Where there’s smoke there’s a cigar

    Posted by Weekend Golfer | November 23, 2009, 11:25
  68. I have known Michelle for a number of years – her story is true. The fact that they were both so stupid is their business. The fact that Mike Rann has consistently denied this, talks directly to his credibility and honesty as Premier. “Media Mike” – it is your turn to have the media attentiopn again – just not in your control this time.

    Posted by One who knows | November 23, 2009, 11:27
  69. If I had my way I would pass a law that made it a criminal offence for the media, all forms, radio, tv, newspapers, etc, to publish any information about a persons sex life without their written consent and the consent of any other party involved. It would carry mandatory 20 years jail for reporters, editors, and all other people involved in compliling these stories.

    One more thing……she’s a lying cheating slut…..she has no right talking morols to anyone. Now she’s getting more money for her story then most hard working people make over a few years hard work………that makes her a whore too. But this is most women nowdays……hence why you hear no women putting her down or defending Mike Rann……but they will defend the hell out of a women who gets a bit on the side with a married man……and claim the women is entitled to sue a man after carrying on a sleazy affair with him…..this is now law in Australia…….the mistress law. Wake up men and stop being jealous of every guy that gets a bit and start defending their……and your right….to have consensual sex with another consenting adult….if you want to keep punishing men for that……your day will come to you know

    Posted by Stu | November 23, 2009, 12:32
  70. Hey “One Who Knows” – you know she is telling the truth because you watched them have sex, I assume.

    Just because she told you something is true, doesn’t mean it is.

    Of course Mike Rann denied it – she has a husband and young children to think about. Pity she didn’t taken them into consideration when she decided to go so public.

    Posted by glad I'm not her children | November 23, 2009, 13:11
  71. it should be a prerequisite that any fella ( im a male) should be gelded before they enter politics………come to think of it a lot have ;;;Rann used his position to his advantage.. you just dont abuse your position of trust…..he has abused the trust if the australian voter

    Posted by jazz | November 23, 2009, 17:17
  72. Why is she wanting a public apology when she outted herself?

    Idiot!

    Posted by Suzy | November 23, 2009, 17:49
  73. Of course I did not see anything of the sort. However, I have been privvy to enough conversation to know that you could not make anything up like that – and this was some years ago now. Michelle is not the smartest blade in the drawer, and was obviously attracted to the power thing. (What else could it have been????) Rann however, has no such excuse. He just wanted a root basically. And that is cool if he was not involved with someone else – but to deny it so shamelessly, that leaves me really cold. “I did not sex with that woman” – is so yesterday – Clinton did that already – except it was “I did not have sexual relations with that woman”. I don’t understand why Michelle did this – she will pay a big price, and all the money in the world won’t make up for whatever money she has received. But I don’t believe a politician who has been elected based on the trust of the people, should be able to abuse their trust with outright lies. How could anyone trust Mike Rann again? He could have averted this all by just admitting to it, and it would have gone away. Regardless of whether Micehlle has or has not done the right thing, this is now about more than that. It is about the trust we put in your elected representatives – and we do not expect them to outright lie.
    I think Mike Rann has done a very wrong thing here.

    Posted by One who knows | November 23, 2009, 18:13
  74. when in a corner caught with pants down start sueing He’s a real mans man “Sasha start looking for good counsel”

    Posted by jazz | November 23, 2009, 19:13
  75. I wonder what the story of the ‘wronged’ husband actually is? Nothing much about his history. Michelle has a victim mentality wonder where that came from, we will know more I’m sure.

    Posted by MUNDANE DRAMA | November 23, 2009, 20:16
  76. To me Michelle looks like 49. Hmmm lifestyle maybe??? And why telling the story now, four years later??? Give me a break and interview money to the charities. Cheers.

    Posted by Fortunate | November 23, 2009, 21:36
  77. Interesting our new state business
    logo is “SA the Advantage State.”
    Looks like Mike showed some leadership here and took full
    advantage of the situatiom.
    He will shortly retire to Spain.
    AWD project-Spain
    Trams – Spain
    DeSal – Spain
    Media wants to dig into this issue
    to see what advantages are to SA.

    Posted by Ted | November 24, 2009, 10:45
  78. Hands up all those who believe that the wronged husband has been running around with evidence of the affair for the last three years and not a single journalist was interested in the slightest whiff of a scandal involving the Premier.

    Posted by yeah right | November 24, 2009, 23:22
  79. Hey ‘One Who Knows’ – is Michelle also telling the truth when she claims to have been happily married but had an affair anyway?

    Posted by i don't think so | November 24, 2009, 23:24
  80. I think she is annoying and disgusting. Maybe she and her ‘husband’ are in financial woes and cooked this up! She is no victim and needs to take responsibility for her actions as an adult. Has she heard of the word ‘NO?’ Absolutely tacky, disgusting behaviour. I feel sorry for Mrs Rann because he may have been seeing this barmaid at the same time when he was dating her before she became the Mrs. Her husband deserves to be charged -acts deranged. They are an embarassment to Adelaide – the husband and wife. Sasha should get a backbone and leave Rann, why do these women who are two timed stay??? Families SA should take the kids away from these morons.

    Posted by Col | November 25, 2009, 18:02
  81. I meant Wayne Phillips is deranged and take the kids away from him and the barmaid. Hate to be these poor kids at school – hope they don’t go to Salisbury High where she worked as a school services officer.

    Posted by PS Col | November 25, 2009, 18:04
  82. Why is Michelle so vindictive and tacky! It’s over women – move on! We don’t want to hear your foul details – makes me sick.

    Posted by Harriet | November 25, 2009, 18:06
  83. yes, she was the receptionist at salisbury high school.

    Posted by anonymous | November 26, 2009, 12:06

Post a comment

VEXNEWS Archive

September 2010
M T W T F S S
« Aug    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930